Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jalil Ahsan Nadvi
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 17:48, 12 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Consensus to delete following relisting. The Bushranger One ping only 02:05, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Jalil Ahsan Nadvi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
After I removed unambiguous copyright violation of [1], there is hardly any content left. Someone else had already tagged it for notability. It now makes no assertion of notability whatsoever. It contains one source, which is a book that no Google search I have tried can link it to the subject in any way. Even if the subject is mentioned in the book, it must be a minuscule reference. The subject is not notable, and the article only serves to promote that non-notable subject. hajatvrc @ 07:10, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 10:49, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 10:49, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Fails WP:GNG. Secret of success (talk) 16:27, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:30, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 04:21, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete There is no information provided supporting any sort of notability, notority, or significant history and is therefore WP:NN Яεñ99 (talk) 06:39, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- delete clear failure of WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 12:48, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.