Jump to content

Miller v. National Broadcasting Co.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Sumanuil (talk | contribs) at 02:10, 6 April 2022. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Miller v. National Broadcasting Co.
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeals
Full case name Brownie Miller et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. National Broadcasting Company et al., Defendants and Respondents.
DecidedDecember 18, 1986 (1986-12-18)
Citation187 Cal. App. 3d 1463; 232 Cal.Rptr. 668
Court membership
Judges sittingVaino Spencer, Lloyd Hanson, Gilbert Ruiz[a]
Case opinions
Decision byHanson

Miller v. National Broadcasting Co. 232 Cal. Rptr 668 (1986) is a US tort law case on negligent infliction of emotional distress.

Background

On October 30, 1979 an NBC camera crew was following a group of Los Angeles Fire Department firefighters and paramedics. A call came in about a man having a heart attack. The camera crew and the paramedics rushed to the home of Brownie and Dave Miller. The camera crew, without consent from anyone, rushed into the house with the paramedics and taped footage of Mr. Dave Miller having what would be a fatal heart attack. The crew later that night would put the footage on the air, also without consent. Brownie Miller filed suit against NBC, Ruben Norte (a producer for NBC) and the city of Los Angeles for trespass, invasion of privacy and infliction of emotional distress.[1]

Decision

The Court of Appeals ruled ultimately in favor of the plaintiff, reversing the District Court's summary judgement. In an opinion written by Justice Lloyd Hanson, the court determined that the media does not have the same access privileges to a private property as emergency responders, even if the media obtained consent to follow the emergency responders.[1] Hanson wrote, "One seeking emergency medical attention does not thereby "open the door" for persons without any clearly identifiable and justifiable official reason who may wish to enter the premises where the medical aid is being administered…the clear line of demarcation between the public interest served by public officials and that served by private business must not be obscured."

Notes

  1. ^ Filling vacancy

References

  1. ^ a b Michelle Houret, Warning to the Press: Knock before Entering, 8 Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Review 201 (1988).

Text of Miller v. National Broadcasting Co. is available from: CourtListener Google Scholar Justia vLex