Talk:2020s in fashion

Coastal Grandmother was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 27 August 2022 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into 2020s in fashion. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Fashion Low‑importance

	Fashion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Years Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

COVID-19 Low‑importance

	COVID-19 portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject COVID-19, a project to coordinate efforts to improve all COVID-19-related articles. If you would like to help, you are invited to join and to participate in project discussions.COVID-19Wikipedia:WikiProject COVID-19Template:WikiProject COVID-19COVID-19
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 19 January 2021 and 28 April 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Tamaraarlet. Peer reviewers: Morganwheee, TyOrlando.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 16:40, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

KNGMARY.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:35, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Byre gorra.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:24, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The youth fashion section (and other complaints)

I think that instead of the currently existent Dark Academia and Goblincore/Fairy Grunge sections, there should be a short writeup on "internet aesthetic culture" as a whole (this article was the best I could find detailing the phenomenon). Also, while this might just be me, I think the 2000s and 1980s influences section under men's clothing needs a serious revision. That third sentence is more than 3000 characters long, haha. Tridentarii3apologist (talk) 04:55, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I concur with this. The aesthetics brought up are considered part of a broader system of "aesthetics" or "-cores" by the practitioners, online influencers, instagram, tiktok, twitter and tumblr pages. The trend in general centers around tribalism but instead of focusing on subculture or fandom culture, it draws its power from shared codes like color palettes, emulated fashion eras, etc, inviting the user to "find their aesthetic" in a way similar to the Marie Kondo precept of "choosing what sparks joy" and as a means of escapism. Academia and Fairy Grunge are only parts of the categorizations invented on social media, which also include aethereal, "art hoe", techwear/cyberpunk, cottagecore, kidcore, weirdcore and more. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.178.122.159 (talk) 04:10, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The 1980s section in particular, confusingly has non-80s specific items such as Ivy League cardigans and 1940s double breasted suits mentioned too. The section should be titled "period revivals" or something similar.--Mr. 123453334 (talk) 21:26, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There's nothing confusing about it, if you knew anything about 1980s fashion. The double breasted 1940s style suits were revived in the 80s as businesswear, and Ivy League clothing was revived as the preppy look. 81.96.86.81 (talk) 15:20, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Dopamine Dressing"

I think a section should be included for this recent fashion trend called "dopamine dressing", where people wear bright colors to improve their mood. sources may include:

How To Embrace Dopamine Dressing This Summer | British Vogue

What is dopamine dressing? (harpersbazaar.com)

What Is 'Dopamine Dressing'? A Fashion Psychologist Breaks Down the Pinterest Style Trend (today.com)

How 'dopamine dressing' became TikTok's latest happiness hack (nypost.com)

Camdoodlebop (talk) 00:29, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]