Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ayo Lekuti

Ayo Lekuti

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence found of any notability, just databases and sources which aren't independent (e.g. from the team) Fram (talk) 08:20, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and England. Fram (talk) 08:20, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 10:00, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 10:07, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Draft Move to draft space, the whole point of draft space is a place to start articles like these. Should have been done instead of going to AfD. Govvy (talk) 10:34, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:22, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify as an WP:ATD - subject not yet notable, might be notable in the future Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:11, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No traces of GNG coverage. Why would we expect him to be notable in the near future? JoelleJay (talk) 19:36, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quite often, young players that debut are on an upward trajectory. There are, of course, plenty that play a game or two then disappear, as we both know. If the subject does become notable in the near future, it would be easier to update the draft than to create something from scratch or ask the deleting admin to restore to user space or equivalent. I'm not too fussed either way as I accept that the subject isn't notable so deletion is not unreasonable. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:01, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]