Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JessiKa Violet
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 06:54, 4 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 06:54, 4 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:13, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- JessiKa Violet (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
I can't find any secondary source coverage for this model - nothing in gnews (except for a mention that may not be her, and has zero to do with modeling), or anything that shows up in ghits that indicates she is in any way notable according to WP:BIO. Mr. Vernon (talk) 07:31, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- Arbitrarily0 (talk) 18:41, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 00:25, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Fails WP:BIO. Schuym1 (talk) 00:50, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete per nom. -- Vary Talk 01:20, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - fails notability guidelines for people. Matt (Talk) 03:15, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete: FAILS notability guidelines for people. She is an amateur model, and should not be on Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.237.248.150 (talk) 18:33, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete: Fails, as per nomination. -- 209.135.77.138 (talk) 21:47, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.