User talk:AlienTasks

May 2023

Hello, I'm JML1148. I noticed that in this edit to Neutron radiation, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. JML1148 (Talk | Contribs) 09:45, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I understand your concern about removing that content. I would like to inform, that Cosmogenic neutrons is not directly connected to Neutron radiation and it is also misleading. Hence I removed that one topic.

Thank you

AlienTasks AlienTasks (talk) 09:50, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Spectral line. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 11:20, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It was by mistake

thank you

Alien tasks AlienTasks (talk) 11:22, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit reversion

In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.

I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. S Philbrick (Talk) 12:00, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think the source are there in the public domain, even if not all may not be copyrighted. Please restore the content.

AlienTasks AlienTasks (talk) 12:37, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]