Module talk:Check for unknown parameters
Appearance
Module:Check for unknown parameters is permanently protected from editing because it is a heavily used or highly visible module. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{edit protected}} to notify an administrator to make the requested edit.
|
Templates | ||||
|
This module was considered for merging on 2019 December 30. The result of the discussion was "no consensus". |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Check for unknown parameters module. |
|
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
Pagenames involved
For de-confusion, pagenames involved:
- Module:Check for unknown parameters -- has best documentation
- Module talk:Check for unknown parameters
- Template:Checks for unknown parameters/doc -- needs a check; transclusion advice 'Use this /doc in template documentation' is tested or applied?
- Template:Checks for unknown parameters -- has plural Checks ...
- Template:Check for unknown parameters (R) → Template:Checks for unknown parameters
- Template talk:Checks for unknown parameters (R) → Module talk:Check for unknown parameters -- was redlink; now talk central
- WP:CFUP (R) → Template:Checks for unknown parameters/doc -- R to the /doc, not create a templatename-redirect
- Not done (yet): Template:fcup as template R?
-DePiep (talk) 07:37, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Feature request
Would it be possible to distinguish between unknown and deprecated parameters? It would be useful sometimes to track deprecated parameters in a different category, or with a different preview message. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 20:17, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
- Module:Check for deprecated parameters. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:06, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 17:42, 5 December 2023 (UTC)