User talk:Mpleahy

Andre Cailloux

Thank you for your contribution of this article. I found it when I was editing the 1st Louisiana Native Guard article, which links to Captain Cailloux. I monitor Civil War articles as a part of the Civil War Task Force on Wikipedia, which is a group of editors that seek to continuously improve various articles. Use User:Hlj/CWediting as a guideline for future Civil War articles, and welcome aboard!!!! Scott Mingus 22:14, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello from Tennessee

(In case you're not watching my talk page, which I also posted this reply.)

Hi Mpleahy, thanks for the note. It's nice to hear from someone with overlapping interests. I am actually approaching this from the Mexican point of view, and it's a little outside my usual time span. Most of my work has been on the colonial period in Mexico, but I'm hoping to exand that into 19th century independent Mexico. Rbraunwa 00:22, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the Military history WikiProject!

Hi, and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:

Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can watchlist it if you're interested; or, you can add it directly to your user page by including {{WPMILHIST Announcements}} there.
Most important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
The project has a monthly newsletter; it will normally be delivered as a link, but several other formats are available.

There are a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—and wherever—you'd like:

Starting some new articles? Our article structure guidelines outline some things to include.
Interested in working on a more complete article? The military history peer review and collaboration departments would welcome your help!
Working on featured-level articles? We have some advice for nominators, and an A-Class review process to help check high-quality articles.
Want to help with specific requests for assistance? Our requests page has extensive lists of requested articles, images, maps, and translations.
Interested in a particular area of military history? We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, or periods.
Want to know how good our articles are? The assessment department is working on rating the quality of every military history article in Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask one of the project coordinators, or any experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Kirill Lokshin 22:28, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Southernexpress.jpg

I notice the copyright status of the image has been confirmed, but I think I still owe you an explanation as to why I tagged it as {{PUIdisputed}} when you re-uploaded it. The reason was that the artist's website did not appear to corroborate the {{GFDL}} template on the image page, hence I thought the image might not be GFDL-licensed as you claimed. In future, you can remove the possibility of this misunderstanding by linking to the copyright statement of the website you took the image from on the image's description page, with a statement similar to:

According to http://www.example.com/copyright.html, this image is licensed under GFDL (replace "GFDL" with the correct license).

(This is in addition to the placement of {{GFDL}} or another correct license template.)

Regards, Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 08:26, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Lecene.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Lecene.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:06, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue VIII - October 2006

The October 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 22:17, 25 October 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Deleting articles you created

Welcome! To delete an article you created, if you are the only person to make significant edits to it, put {{db-author}} on it. See also WP:CSD#G7. Also you should sign your posts with ~~~~ - that will set up the links to your user page automatically - in the talk page for Miss Snark, your signature links to the page User. --Jamoche 01:50, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue IX - November 2006

The November 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 22:52, 26 November 2006 (UTC) [reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue X - December 2006

The December 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 23:06, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XI - January 2007

The January 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 21:07, 23 January 2007 (UTC) [reply]

WP:MILHIST Coordinator Elections

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are looking to elect seven coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by February 11!

Delivered by grafikbot 11:15, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military History elections

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting seven coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of sixteen candidates. Please vote here by February 25!

Delivered by grafikbot 14:32, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Atheangelism

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Atheangelism, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Julius Sahara 18:52, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If "atheistic evangelism" or "evangelical atheism" are much more conventional terms, shouldn't the article be renamed? I will later evaluate whether this theme is notable enough to warrant an article on Wikipedia, but for the time being, I'll let it stay. Julius Sahara 17:37, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Atheistic Evangelism

Hi there, I have been looking over the article now and again and at stuff on the internet and today heard an interview with Richard Dawkins on NPR and I'm wondering how you would feel about a proposal to merge this article with the Atheism article? I do agree that it is a My feeling is that even with the name change it is still about a minor subset of the topic, Atheism rather than something unique enough for an article. Thanks in advance for your input!--killing sparrows 04:02, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]