Talk:Irek Hamidullin

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Military history: Biography / Russian & Soviet Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force

Misplaced copyvio concern

I received a heads-up that the article Irek Hamidullan was a copyvio. Impressive that I received this heads-up almost instantly.

But the concern is misplaced:

The default license at the site the robot thought was being inappropriately copied is public domain.
I was the sole author of the article. Geo Swan (talk) 02:43, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Geo Swan, yes the bot only understands content, not context. Question though, was that article originally on WP (as that site says it is heavily comprised of deleted WP articles)? Crow^Caw 22:05, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes the site is heavily comprised of deleted WP articles. However, there are several dozen articles I first drafted there, where there are looser standards as to what can be included, and which I ported to the wikipedia when additional references were published, which would make it more likely for the article to withstand a challenge over notability.

I don't know why those earlier ports didn't trigger the attention of the bot. Geo Swan (talk) 04:22, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks, I sort of figured that was the case. Anything created there first seems to be OK, but they are mis-licensing content they pull from here. I can bore you if you wish, but long story short (too late!) I think we're good here. Thanks for the explanation and the article itself! Crow^Caw 23:15, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]