Talk:W91

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / North America / United States Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Is this info good to have on the internet? Don't we all feel smart, butting this info out... oh, we are so smart arn't we? Is this how we show how tough, and mocho, and smart we are? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.142.93.27 (talk • contribs)

Please see The Nuclear Weapons Archive, which has far more info, in far more detail, including the detailed physics and engineering. And has been on the internet in some form or another for 15 or more years. Don't be paranoid about Wikipedia coverage on this topic... Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 02:50, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]