Talk:George E. Russell

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
	This article was accepted from this draft on 17 January 2021 by reviewer Chicdat (talk · contribs).

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Canada: Saskatchewan Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Saskatchewan.

AngusWOOF chicdat I took a look at at the recent edits and checked the sources. Several meet WP:IS—The CBC [1], the Montreal Gazette [2], canadianart [3], and the Saskatoon StarPhoenex [4]. Those publications all published full articles on Russell, which argues in favor of WP:Basic. Also, the owner of a prominent gallery and a former currator from the Montreal Museum of Fine Arts both consider his work significant. Galleries are also continuing to exhibit his work four years after his death. The full monograph cited (George E. Russell, Rétrospective) is in the Quebec State Library's collection [5] and the author has a masters in art history from Université du Québec à Montréal. Those feel in favor of the first criteria of WP:Artist. The original author seemed to do a good job modifying the tone to meet WP:NPOV and I added a paragraph to the Donation and discovery subsection to help explain Russell's notability. Any thoughts? Bruce (talk) 18:37, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

Brucehs, this needs to be explained in the lead paragraph and supported by the sources. PressReader is a news aggregator though, so that can't be used as one of the WP:THREE sources. Also, the article shouldn't have a lead quote that reads like a dedication to his memory. As soon as I saw that, I had to tag it for NPOV. You may need to ask chicdat why the article was rejected afterwards. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 19:49, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AngusWOOF I'll rework the article to make things more clear in the introduction and then update the talk page to highlight three best sources for chicdat. I found the PressReader article on the newspapers website, so will change the link. The lead quote is from the monograph on his work. If I make that sourcing clear, would it make sense to put that in a section focused on critical response? Thanks so much. Bruce (talk) 20:59, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Brucehs, the quote can be mentioned in critical reception with attribution. (critic) of (newspaper/magazine/journal) wrote that "(quote)" AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 21:03, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Brucehs, I rejected it because it wasn't in a neutral point of view. 🐔 Chicdat ^{Bawk to me!} 21:25, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

But now it is. Thank you for fixing the draft. You are welcome to resubmit it. 🐔 Chicdat ^{Bawk to me!} 21:30, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Three best sources for resubmission.

Per WP:THREE:

Bruce (talk) 14:34, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]