Talk:Reel Moments

Reel Moments was a Media and drama good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
December 3, 2011	Good article nominee	Not listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on September 6, 2011.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Reel Moments is a competition in which Glamour readers submit short stories to be produced as short films by celebrity volunteer female directors?

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Film: Filmmaking C‑class

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by the Filmmaking task force.

Screenwriters

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Screenwriters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of screenwriting, screenwriters, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScreenwritersWikipedia:WikiProject ScreenwritersTemplate:WikiProject Screenwritersscreenwriter
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Literature C‑class Low‑importance

	Literature portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

File:Jessicabielgfdl.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Jessicabielgfdl.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests October 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 12:22, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Reel Moments/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk · contribs) 01:39, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found.

Linkrot: one found and tagged.[1] Jezhotwells (talk) 01:45, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
Objectives of the project include empowering women by producing female-friendly short films while creating opportunities for actresses to direct and extending the Glamour brand This is ungrammatical, "while creating opportunities for actresses to direct and extending the Glamour brand" confuses the subjects of the sentence. Please rewrite.

She also, co-wrote the film. Why the comma?

was received so well that she parlayed the experience into a directing role poor word choice

Carol Leifer was the final director of Blinders So who was the first director?

the films were also produced by a woman from Moxie Pictures in Los Angeles. Who?

Wilson sings the closing track in her film. change of tense here, be consistent.

The films were debuted at ?? "debuted at" or "were premiered at"

Why do we jump from 2008 to 2010? What happened in 2009?

The films debuted at the Directors Guild Theater on October 25, 2010 with Weisz in absentia "in absentia" Please? Are you tring to impress by using words you don't understand?

included a cast of Christina Ricci, Daniel Stern, Kathy Najimy and Troy Garity "included a cast of"?

Other volunteer actors include Justin Long, Aziz Azari, and Jaclyn Jonet. Change of tense

The shorts, that fall under the year's theme of empowering women to feel beautiful, will open on October 24 at the Director's Guild Theater and be available on glamourreelmoments.com the following day. That was six weeks ago. Did it happen?

Organization is poor, the article consists mainly of badly written statements thrown together, with no structure or flow. No critical comment, no reception.

Lead does not summarize the article, see WP:LEAD.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
One dead link as noted above.

Sources appear reliable, no evidence of OR
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
Organization is poor, the article consists mainly of statements thrown together, lots of trivia, with no structure or flow. No critical comment, no reception.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
NPOV
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
stable
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
A surfeit of images which appear to be eye candy, without adding any extra content.
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
A rough first draft but nowhere near GA standard. Not listed. Jezhotwells (talk) 02:20, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Reel Moments. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110929174807/http://stylescenes.latimes.com/fashion/ben_affleck_gone_baby_gone_jennifer_aniston_pink_ciara_glamour_magazine_reel_moments_director/ to http://stylescenes.latimes.com/fashion/ben_affleck_gone_baby_gone_jennifer_aniston_pink_ciara_glamour_magazine_reel_moments_director/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:56, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]