Jump to content

Talk:WWE brand extension

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by InternetArchiveBot (talk | contribs) at 18:31, 17 September 2017 (Notification of altered sources needing review #IABot (v1.5.2)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconBusiness B‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconProfessional wrestling B‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconWWE brand extension is within the scope of WikiProject Professional wrestling, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to professional wrestling. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, visit the project to-do page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to discussions.
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Real names...?

Can someone put the draft board under the 2002 part please? I can't seem to figure it out. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.190.227.202 (talk) 05:10, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why the heck are there so many 'real names' on this page?

You wouldn't put an actor's name after a character's name in an episode plot guide... This is the same thing.

They should be taken down. Most wrestlers would find it insulting for a fan to use their real name. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.118.239.229 (talk) 11:05, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Article Title

I think the page should be renamed "WWE brand split." During the inaugural incarnation, extension made more sense considering the purchase of WCW and ECW, but I don't see the truth in "extension" in the upcoming incarnation. On the other hand, splitting the roster took place in the original and will take place in the upcoming incarnation. 0737290632t2x273n (talk) 01:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on WWE brand extension. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:00, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on WWE brand extension. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:03, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on WWE brand extension. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:31, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]