Talk:Battle of Forbie

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Kurdistan Low‑importance

	Kurdistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kurdistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Kurdistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KurdistanWikipedia:WikiProject KurdistanTemplate:WikiProject KurdistanKurdistan
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Medieval / Crusades

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500)
	Crusades task force

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Middle Ages: Crusades Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Crusades task force.

[Untitled]

" ...generally considered to be Al-zahir Biabars who became Sultan of Egypt in 1260! ". how generally considered ? : never any historian said al zahir baibars led this battle. many people used to have same name . Actually you need to put a citation that they were same person not vv :) Samsam22 (talk) 21:36, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Are the numbers for each side correct? I have always been under the assumption that the Crusaders were outnumbered (as they normally were infact) in this battle? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.195.50.47 (talk) 11:26, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

who write the assumption this Baibars was not the Sultan Baibars? and i want to hear the argumentAhendra (talk) 14:59, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article on the Sultan Baibars says that he was the commander of the victorious troops at La Forbie in 1244. Jsc1973 (talk) 05:01, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Who won ?

At the moment the infobox 'result' states: "Ayyubid victory" On looking further down, I see the word 'Ayyubid' is on both sides. Its only when one reads the article that the result becomes more clear. This rather defeats the object of having an infobox.
The 'result' should be a lot more obvious, otherwise...

RASAM (talk) 22:13, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Trans Jordanian?

According to the disambiguation page, this is a Christian entity. This article does not seem to use it in this sense. Could someone who knows this topic better than I do please clarify? Thanks Elinruby (talk) 02:11, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Battle of Forbie?

Any opposition to moving this to just "Forbie"? The "La" part comes from René Grousset, who wrote "La bataille se livra dans la plaine sablonneuse qui s'étend entre Ascalon et Gaza près du village d'Herbiyâ, la Forbie des chroniqueurs." As Ilya Berkovich has explained, English historians misreading Grousset then named the battle "La Forbie." It should therefore be called the Battle of Forbie, as Berkovich calls it, and the name that other recent historians have adopted. See Berkovich, “The Battle of Forbie and the second Frankish Kingdom of Jerusalem,” in Journal of Military History 75 (January 2011), p. 17. Adam Bishop (talk) 18:08, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support I've found numerous mentions of "battle of Forbie". --Kansas Bear (talk) 18:46, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Go ahead. It's good to have an explanation. It's also weird that the French would be misunderstood, since the English construction would be the same ("Herbiya, the Forbie of the chroniclers"). Srnec (talk) 21:47, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done! Adam Bishop (talk) 17:46, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]