User talk:Abratimepoke

This is Abratimepoke's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

AfC notification: Draft:Incision (film) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Incision (film). Thanks! Atlantic306 (talk) 21:31, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

added reviews section to draft article

thank you Abratimepoke (talk) 16:20, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, unfortunately filmthreat takes money for reviews so can you find an alternative reliable sources review to replace it with, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 23:43, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Incision (film) has been accepted

Incision (film), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~Kvng (talk) 16:41, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please work in smaller edits.

Hi Abratimepoke. Thank you for your work with Caylee Cowan. Please note that edits like this are extremely difficult to review. It's best to try to edit one section at a time when making edits that are not minor. Thanks. --Hipal (talk) 01:57, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

I am still learning.

I appreciate the feedback and will make adjustments Abratimepoke (talk) 02:21, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A lengthy welcome

Hi Abratimepoke. Welcome to Wikipedia. I hope you don't mind if I share some of my thoughts on starting out as a new editor on Wikipedia: If I could get editors in your situation to follow just one piece of advice, it would be this: Learn Wikipedia by working only on non-contentious topics until you have a feel for the normal editing process and the policies that usually come up when editing casually. You'll find editing to be fun, easy, and rewarding. The rare disputes are resolved quickly and easily in collaboration.

Working on biographical information about living persons is far more difficult. Wikipedia's Biographies of living persons policy requires strict adherence to multiple content policies, and applies to all information about living persons including talk pages.

If you have a relationship with the topics you want to edit, then you will need to review Wikipedia's Conflict of interest policy, which may require you to disclose your relationship and restrict your editing depending upon how you are affiliated with the subject matter. Regardless, editing in a manner that promotes an entity or viewpoint over others can appear to be detrimental to the purpose of Wikipedia and the neutrality required in articles.

Some topic areas within Wikipedia have special editing restrictions that apply to all editors. It's best to avoid these topics until you are extremely familiar with all relevant policies and guidelines.

If you work from reliable, independent sources, you shouldn't go far wrong. WP:RSP and WP:RSN are helpful in determining if a source is reliable.

If you find yourself in a disagreement with another editor, it's best to discuss the matter on the relevant talk page.

I hope you find some useful information in all this, and welcome again. --Hipal (talk) 01:56, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bad Detectives (November 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:

This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read 'What Wikipedia is not' for more information.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Requires reception to pass WP:INDISCRIMINATE. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate directory or listing of information.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bad Detectives and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 05:16, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Bad Detectives

Hello, Abratimepoke. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bad Detectives, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:09, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]