Jump to content

Talk:Aileen Cannon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 14.203.205.223 (talk) at 11:45, 8 May 2024 (HORRIBLE JUDGE!!!: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Early life and education. Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 14 February 2024

In Section

   Early life and education

there is a Reference

   <ref name=Wilner>

The article in the Reference is archived. But on 2023-02-14 the URL for the original article was still valid.

Into the Cite template, please insert

   | url-status=live

71.162.138.11 (talk) 19:29, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Thanks. Esowteric + Talk + Breadcrumbs 19:47, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You are welcome. Sorry for not checking the reply page sooner. 71.162.138.11 (talk) 20:16, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Political Party

Judges are non-partisan, and in point of fact, no other judge from the Southern District of Florida has a political party appended to their biography. Judge Cannon's biography should have the same designations as the other judges - either all should be called out by the political party of their nominator, or none. This article should be edited to reflect that change. 2601:601:181:7DF0:9493:A65D:BFB2:6CF3 (talk) 17:01, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

They should be non-partisan but their strange and errornous rulings help Trump's delay tactics. So she's either partisan or incompetent. --Denniss (talk) 01:47, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In her case, probably both. 24.184.206.22 (talk) 03:42, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 7 May 2024

change

The hearing featured five judicial nominees, with Republican senators focused on questioning J. Philip Calabrese and Democratic senators focused on questioning Toby Crouse> Afterward Democratic senators sent Cannon many follow-up questions to answer.[14][21]

to

The hearing featured five judicial nominees, with Republican senators focused on questioning J. Philip Calabrese and Democratic senators focused on questioning Toby Crouse. Afterward Democratic senators sent Cannon many follow-up questions to answer.[14][21]

(Replace > by .) Quantum menace (talk) 22:38, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Jamedeus (talk) 22:54, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Broken ref

Heads up that ref 106 is currently broken 104.232.119.107 (talk) 10:35, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Many thanks. If the orphan ref "hugo" was meant to be the same as that defined as "lowell" which quickly follows it (Lowell, Hugo; Joseph, Cameron (May 8, 2024). "Judge scraps date for Trump Mar-a-Lago documents trial without rescheduling". The Guardian. Retrieved May 8, 2024.), then I've fixed it. Esowteric + Talk + Breadcrumbs 10:42, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

HORRIBLE JUDGE!!!

As Trump would say, GO BACK TO COLUMBIA AND REPRESENT ALL THE CRIMINALS THERE YOU LOSER!!! 14.203.205.223 (talk) 11:45, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]