Talk:Masonry
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Masonry article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months  |
 | This  level-3 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Index
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Mason means Freemasonry
This article is useless. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.126.117.235 (talk) 13:18, 26 March 2009 (UTC) i dont know any thing abut this — Preceding unsigned comment added by 197.187.147.208 (talk) 11:44, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
use of "cultured stone"
this page uses "cultured stone" as a synonym for manufactured stone. I'm not sure if this is good because cultured stone is a registered trademark of owens corning, while manufactured stone can refer to st croix, eldorado, and many other brands of artificial stone. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.124.93.115 (talk) 16:39, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Masonry. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090521200923/http://www.ncma.org/resources/productuse/products/concrete/Pages/Glazed%28Prefaced%29Units.aspx to http://www.ncma.org/resources/productuse/products/concrete/Pages/Glazed%28Prefaced%29Units.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:59, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Tags
There are some tags on the article. Can they be fixed? What is the layout problem? Hexedwoozy (talk) 09:37, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
- I concur that the layout issues are not apparent. I'm removing that tag, & the "unfocussed" one because there has been no attempt to explain them. Otherwise the article looks fine as it stands -- except that it needs more references. And maybe a section on the history of masonry, if one can be written. -- llywrch (talk) 15:41, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
How to handle duplicates between Masonry and Stonemasonry article
Masonry is largely divided between stonemasonry and brickwork, with the use of mortar as their main commonality. The stonemasonry article has a long history section, whereas the masonry article does not. Is it good to summarize the stonemasonry history to be used directly in the masonry article? Or is it better to rewrite the masonry history from scratch, interweaving between stonework and brickwork and their evolution? I noticed that Stonemasonry is in Wikiprojects Crafts, and masonry is in Wikiprojects Architecture, so there can potentially be a perspective difference there. Pinkslimo (talk) 21:45, 11 November 2023 (UTC)