User talk:Arnaudls

Welcome!

Hello, Arnaudls, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

I see you've been busy contributing lots of geneology, even new articles. Could I press you to cite your references for this information? If you need help, just ask! Melchoir 06:29, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Schloss isenberg.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Schloss isenberg.gif. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:09, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Seal_Friedrich_Isenberg.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Seal_Friedrich_Isenberg.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:01, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Wappen_engelbert.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Wappen_engelbert.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:33, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Limburg-Styrum/Stirum

Is there any reason you chose the spelling you did? You are missing the hyphen so the page Limburg Stirum has to be renamed to Limburg-Stirum at the least; but every source I have seen uses Styrum in preference to Stirum, moreso the German ones. Also you redirected the pages without adding the info to the main article, even though the pages should not have been redirected in the first place (only corrected, expanded, etc. as normally done with German states and nobility on Wikipedia). Suggest you undo the redirecting. - Nomadic1 08:24, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Limburg Stirum spelling is used as the 'official' current spelling of the family name in Belgium and the Netherland, where the family still lives on. Hyphen has been used from time to time but is no longer used. Also for Styrum, I used the current spelling, although it was spelled with a Y a few centuries ago.

Image tagging for Image:Richenza of Poland.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Richenza of Poland.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:11, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Schloss Altena.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Schloss Altena.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:07, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Schloss_Borculo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Schloss_Borculo.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 00:12, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Gemen-Arms.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Gemen-Arms.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. YellowDot 01:19, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Other issues:

Image:Seal Friedrich Isenberg.gif does not have a source or proper copyright tag.
Image:Wappen engelbert.jpg does not have a source or proper copyright tag.
Same for Image:Wappen altena-mark.gif
And for Image:Wappen berg alt.gif
And for Image:Wappen isenberg.gif
And for Image:Schloss isenberg.gif
Sources are required for all images.
PD-inelegible tag is to used only for non-artistic images likes ones of geometric figures.
If you have questions - Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

YellowDot 01:27, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Eberhard I

Your Eberhard I should be under a different Lemma there are several Eberhard I so you should make his Lemma more like Eberhard I, Count of Limburg. Or whatever.--Tresckow 18:48, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding edits to House of Limburg-Stirum

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Arnaudls! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule \bangelfire\.com\/, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was intended to promote a site you own, are affiliated with, or will make money from inclusion in Wikipedia, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 10:44, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Schloss Altena.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Schloss Altena.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:10, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This painting dates from the Middle Ages, around 1200ad, and is therefore in the public domain. Its author -unknown- died more than 100 years ago as tagged.

Y	Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s): Autoblock of 213.42.21.56 lifted or expired. Request handled by: Yamla 14:20, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Evrard Louis de Limburg Stirum

A "{{prod}}" template has been added to the article Evrard Louis de Limburg Stirum, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. B. Wolterding 16:03, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their autoblock or shared IP address block be lifted:

Arnaudls (block log • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • user rights management • checkuser (log))

IP address: 213.42.21.60 (block log • active blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • WHOIS • RDNS • RBLs • unblock • checkuser (log))
Blocking admin: Can't sleep, clown will eat me (talk • blocks)
Block message:

repeated additions of unsourced and potentially libellous content

WARNING: If you were blocked directly then you are using the wrong template and your block will not be reviewed since you have not provided a reason for unblocking. Please use {{unblock | reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} instead.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, or when you need checkuser assistance, please place {{subst:Unblock on hold-notification | 1=Arnaudls}} on the administrator's talk page. Then replace this template with the following:

{{unblock-auto on hold | 1=Can't sleep, clown will eat me | 2=<nowiki>repeated additions of unsourced and potentially libellous content</nowiki> | 3=213.42.21.60 | 4= | 5=~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting decline reason here with any specific rationale. If the decline= parameter is omitted, a reason for unblocking will be requested.

{{unblock-auto reviewed | 1=213.42.21.60 | 2=<nowiki>repeated additions of unsourced and potentially libellous content</nowiki> | 3=Can't sleep, clown will eat me | decline=decline reason here ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock-auto reviewed | 1=213.42.21.60 | 2=<nowiki>repeated additions of unsourced and potentially libellous content</nowiki> | 3=Can't sleep, clown will eat me | accept=accept reason here ~~~~}}

I've contacted the blocking admin for comment; in the meantime, please bear with us, and thanks for your patience. – Luna Santin (talk) 23:22, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]