Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hampton Towne Centre
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by TenPoundHammer (talk | contribs) at 01:57, 26 July 2007 (→[[Hampton Towne Centre]]: closed). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy delete, non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 01:57, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Hampton Towne Centre (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Yet another attempt to rid Wikipedia of stupid articles I shouldn't have created. Admittedly, this was written pretty well but it's just not a notable mall by any means (it's totally dead). Would be a db-author but other editors have tweaked the page. (Remind me to nuke the images too.) Ten Pound Hammer • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 22:37, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. I should have tagged this page ages ago -- after all, I do have a WP:COI here (for shame, for shame). The angelfire page cited as a "reference" is my own webpage. Note, however that I haven't edited the page in ages. Ten Pound Hammer • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 22:57, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - just to be perverse. do what you like. --Rocksanddirt 23:15, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Say what? Ten Pound Hammer • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 23:24, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I think Rocksanddirt is suggesting that you should db-author it and get it over with. :). -- Ben 23:46, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, I guess that works too. Nobody else has made substantial edits (save for some IP edits back when I had a habit of forgetting to log in). Ten Pound Hammer • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 00:44, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Deor 00:04, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom and anyways 50 stores is not quite notable enough for a mall,JForget 00:12, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Nowadays, this mall is more like zero stores, one restaurant and six offices. Ten Pound Hammer • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 00:43, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Tagged with G7 by me. Ten Pound Hammer • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 00:47, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
::As stated initially, its not a db author as several people have worked on it. I removed the tag. The discussion should run. DGG (talk) 01:31, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- My error--it is just TenPoundHammer, in any substantial way. i deleted it per his request.DGG (talk) 01:33, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.