Jump to content

Talk:Cardinal

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Johnbod (talk | contribs) at 00:15, 3 December 2007 (→Requested move: centralizing discussion as agreed). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This template must be substituted. Replace {{Requested move ...}} with {{subst:Requested move ...}}.

Old stuff

How is the Cessna a sub-heading of the bird? SkyDot 19:13, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • The consistency of the existence of strongly inaccessible cardinals can not be proved under ZFC.
    • Is that correct? I thought the existence of strongly inaccessible cardinals can (provably) not be proved, while it is open whether their non-existence can be proved. In other words, "the consistency of the existence of strongly inaccessible cardinals" has not yet been proved while the consistency of their non-existence has been proved.
Yes, your version is correct. That existence of inacc. cardinals cannot be proved is a direct consequence of the 2nd incompleteness theorem (one observes that the set of all sets with rank less than that of an inacc. cardinal form a model of ZFC). Incidentally, wouldn't it be better to have the main article at Cardinal number? "Cardinal" has a pretty well-defined religious meaning as well, and "cardinal number" is not outdated.
not to mention the bird. And the baseball team.--MichaelTinkler
Ok, I'm convinced. Cardinal number it is. --AxelBoldt
As this refers to a subdivision/less obvious definition of the term, could it be emphasised that it is the number that is being referred to, not a religious person being away from their phone (g). Jackiespeel 18:08, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting Mike Cline Contributions

I am deleting or reverting any contributions I have previously made to this article for the following reason. I work for a company that practices and teaches Strategic Planning methodologies thus making my contribution to any article related to Strategy topics a conflict of interest an in violation of Wikipedia Conflict of Interest guidelines WP:COI --Mike Cline 13:25, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cardinal is also a popular swiss beer brand, should I add it?

Revert

Anon. IP removed a link with no explanation. I reverted. -- SECisek 01:25, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

Cardinal → Cardinal (disambiguation) — We should really give the main article to what is now Cardinal (Catholicism). A look at "what links here" shows this is overwhemingly the main use involved. The mathmatical use is at Cardinal number, & if there were a predominant sports team using the term they could have "Cardinals" (I don't have a view on that). Few people can really link to "Cardinal" when they mean "cardinal bird", and the other uses are minor. This page should herefore become "Cardinal (disambiguation)" —Johnbod 20:05, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Please centralize voting and discussion at the survey at Talk:Cardinal_(Catholicism)#Requested_move Johnbod 23:37, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Cardinal&oldid=175369275"