Jump to content

User talk:24.90.233.61

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Luk (talk | contribs) at 23:47, 18 December 2007 (→an easy solution: note: hardblock). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

24.90.233.61 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

this is a shared ip address and i NEVER made these unconstructive edits. i don't think it's fair for me to be blocked since i made many useful edits on wikipedia.

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=this is a shared ip address and i NEVER made these unconstructive edits. i don't think it's fair for me to be blocked since i made many useful edits on wikipedia. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=this is a shared ip address and i NEVER made these unconstructive edits. i don't think it's fair for me to be blocked since i made many useful edits on wikipedia. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=this is a shared ip address and i NEVER made these unconstructive edits. i don't think it's fair for me to be blocked since i made many useful edits on wikipedia. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Regarding Edits to Dancing With The Stars (US Season 5)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, , as you did to Dancing With The Stars (US Season 5). Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. User:Jandal3c 23:49, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

November 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Dancing with the Stars (US season 6), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Dancing with the Stars (US season 6) was changed by 24.90.233.61 (c) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2007-11-29T01:16:44+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 01:16, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Dancing with the Stars (US season 5) constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks – Gurch 02:12, 29 November 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Dancing with the Stars (US season 6) worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Master of Puppets Care to share? 23:55, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

December 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Dancing with the Stars (US season 5), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. under wp guidelines your edits do not meet wp standards. Since your edit does not cite any references Wikipedia:Citing sources your edits will be removed. Any further edits should be brought to the talk page. Jeanenawhitney (talk) 21:07, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 21:52, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Answer to why

Also see Talk:Dancing with the Stars (US season 5)

Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Dancing with the Stars (US season 5), is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. This is especially important when dealing with biographies of living people, but applies to all Wikipedia articles. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are already familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Thank you. see Wikipedia:Citing sources also see WP:NPOV. Since your edit does not cite any references your edits were removed. --Jeanenawhitney (talk) 23:26, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Verifiability#Sources. also see above Talk:Dancing with the Stars (US season 5)#How do we source this article? and Talk:Dancing with the Stars (US season 5)#Personal stories section unless it comes from say the abc web site or a newspaper or magazine you can not put this in. --Jeanenawhitney (talk) 09:47, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Give it a break already

Move on, quit arguing as you keep on doing at Dancing with the Stars (US season 5). Read up on Wikipedia manual of style and start contributing with good edits Jeanenawhitney (talk) 19:53, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Dancing with the Stars (U.S. TV series), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jeanenawhitney (talk) 22:26, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Dancing with the Stars (U.S. TV series), you will be blocked from editing. Anastrophe (talk) 21:38, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. -- lucasbfr talk 21:52, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

24.90.233.61 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i never made these edits.

Decline reason:

Someone using your IP address did, and this does not appear to be a shared address. — Yamla (talk) 22:48, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

24.90.233.61 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

this is a shared ip address and i NEVER made these unconstructive edits. i don't think it's fair for me to be blocked since i made many useful edits on wikipedia.

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=this is a shared ip address and i NEVER made these unconstructive edits. i don't think it's fair for me to be blocked since i made many useful edits on wikipedia. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=this is a shared ip address and i NEVER made these unconstructive edits. i don't think it's fair for me to be blocked since i made many useful edits on wikipedia. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=this is a shared ip address and i NEVER made these unconstructive edits. i don't think it's fair for me to be blocked since i made many useful edits on wikipedia. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

an easy solution

there's an easy solution to your predicament. open an account. it's that simple. while i'm reluctant to express motive here, the reality looks really bad. clicking 'user contributions' shows almost all edits ever performed by this IP address to be on the dancing with the stars article. if this really is a shared IP address, then the likelyhood that the IP was briefly assigned to some other roadrunner account, and that account then vandalized - of all the millions of articles on wikipedia - the dancing with the stars article, well, let's just say the odds of that happening are probably a billion to one. and then that you'd be re-assigned the same IP address again within a very short interval is also highly unlikely. on the other hand, if you habitually leave your PC unattended, and others have access to it, then it would be relatively easy for someone to 'get you in trouble' by looking at your history then purposely doing some vandalism from your PC. the solution to that? open an account. then you can log out of WP when you're away from the computer, and others can't do bad things with your account.

but, the long and short of it is that the odds of the former being the case are vanishingly small; the odds of the latter happening are better - but then the onus, the blame, rests on your shoulders for leaving your computer vulnerable to asshats who would try to get you in trouble here. so, take the next step in being responsible: open an account. then there will be no excuse. and, you'll be able to edit again. (hopefully i'm not talking through my hat - i believe that opening account will get you past the block, but perhaps not. there's only one way for you to find out, however). Anastrophe (talk) 23:45, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note from blocking admin: this is a "hard block", disallowing registered editors to edit. Note that they can request unblock using their account. -- lucasbfr talk 23:47, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:24.90.233.61&oldid=178831886"