User talk:NrDg/Archive 080531

How to use talk pages: (guidelines from Template:User talk top)

Please continue any conversation where it was started.

Thus if I have left a message on your talk page please DO NOT post a reply here.

I will have your talk page on watch and will note when you have replied.

If you want to initiate a conversation, please create a new heading here.

Continue existing conversations under existing headings.

Create a new heading if the original conversation is archived.

Indent your comments when replying by using an appropriate number of colons ':'.
Sign your comments automatically using ~~~~.

Archives: 070625-070920-071102-071231-080131-080229-080331-080429

User:Gerald Gonzalez sock again

He created two new socks: User:LykaRaymundo and User:Carpioeje. Both users have the same editing pattern (All edited articles are about Angel Locsin and its related articles. Please check out LykaRaymundo's contributions and Carpioeje's contributions for evidences. Thanks! -Danngarcia (talk)

User:LykaRaymundo was definitely Gerald. It is likely that User:Carpioeje is not. --NrDg 16:05, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

He created another one just hours ago: User:Kristine Charice. He readds one of his sock's edits to the Lobo (TV series) article. Maybe this article should also be semi-protected. -Danngarcia (talk) 09:04, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

I've already posted this at the Long-term Abuse section; Gerald's now harassing me at YouTube recently, maybe an ArbCom case or an email to Jimbo himself will do; I know he doesn't seem to be malicious, but we had enough of his sockpuppet show. I've recently found his [Hot_Gerald_Gonzalez08@yahoo.com email address], just in case you want to contact him about his actions. God Bless and have a nice day... Blake Gripling (talk) 12:14, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

You'd probably have better luck just contacting him yourself. There is really not much that can be done, other than what we are doing now, to change his behavior. --NrDg 15:58, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

He harassed me, that's why I'm passing the dirty work of contacting him to you guys... Blake Gripling (talk) 23:49, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Miley Cyrus Name Change Source

Actually, the original source only linked to one of the court documents. I posted the second source because it included all of the legal documents. Mike126beatles (talk) 17:44, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

My only real problem is that you broke the cite for the second time the reference was used. Keep the name= parameter when you change the reference and all will be well. Either reference is fine - only need the actual doc for the final name change court order, though, to support the information of what is her legal name. --NrDg 18:09, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for clarifying. --Mike126beatles (talk) 18:25, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for your help with the hannah Montana vandalizer.Mooncrest (talk) 20:55, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

New Project

Myself and several other editors have been compiling a list of very active editors who would likely be available to help new editors in the event they have questions or concerns. As the list grew and the table became more detailed, it was determined that the best way to complete the table was to ask each potential candidate to fill in their own information, if they so desire. This list is sorted geographically in order to provide a better estimate as to whether the listed editor is likely to be active.

If you consider yourself a very active Wikipedian who is willing to help newcomers, please either complete your information in the table or add your entry. If you do not want to be on the list, either remove your name or just disregard this message and your entry will be removed within 48 hours. The table can be found at User:Useight/Highly Active, as it has yet to have been moved into the Wikipedia namespace. Thank you for your help. Useight (talk) 17:47, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Leagrean

Hello NrDg, how've you been. Theres' this one user that keeps irritating me by putting "The Way We Almost Weren't" in the season two area, when there is clearly a section stating it belongs in future episodes. What to do?- Yours truly, [ S ] υ ρ є r ı o r_reply! 20:37, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

The whole issue will be moot on the 4th. I suggest just letting it slide. --NrDg 04:28, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Gerald's now harassing me...

Hey there... After a dozen warnings, this fanboy named User:Gerald Gonzalez, the same user that I'm talking about earlier, is now harassing me by sending hate speech at me via YouTube. You told me he's annoying but not malicious, but it seems as though he's now resorting to being against WP:CIVIL, saying the f-word at me if I request full protection of Angel Locsin's article. I tried blocking him from sending messages to me, but still he's flaming at me. Can you notify him about this? Please??? God Bless and have a nice day, sir...

P.S.: Here's the original message, with profanity asterisked out:

May 03, 2008

f*** you you are *** dont let request Angel Locsin's page to be fully protected because i will kill you. **** YOU So much....your a gay...... hahaha....... uve reported me to NrDg in Wikipedia **** you..... Gay.,....

Blake Gripling (talk) 10:04, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

I, personally, can't think of anything that can be done within Wiki that will solve the problem with personal attacks outside wiki. You might try posting about the situation at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents to get the attention of other admins. --NrDg 04:33, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

He created another sock: User:Ivan Francis. Please check out his contributions for evidences. Thanks! -Danngarcia (talk) 09:49, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Brenda Song's salary

Was moved to Talk:Brenda_Song#Brenda_Song.27s_salary

Talk:Demi Lovato

hey! I don't care what you think! I was talking about Demi lovato on the article's talk page. I was talking aBOUT THE ARTICLE'S TOPIC. Why did you revert it? It doesn't have to be about improving the article? I saw this entry on the talk page and it asked what demi Lovato's heritage is. you did not revert that! why not? besides, why are you acting like you own that that talk page? DemiLovato15 (talk) 00:34, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

There are plenty of places on the net to talk about the article's topic. The talk pages are about improving the article ONLY. General discussions about the topic don't belong. See WP:TALK. "he purpose of a Wikipedia talk page is to provide space for editors to discuss changes to its associated article or project page. Article talk pages should not be used by editors as platforms for their personal views." --NrDg 01:03, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Well it's my personal view! You can't change how I feel just by giving me a ridiculous reply! DemiLovato15 (talk) 01:46, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia is about building an encyclopedia - it is not a social network. If you think our policies are ridiculous you will probably find contributing here fairly frustrating as most editors will do their best to follow our policies and enforce them. You are welcome to make useful contributions withing the bounds of our policies and guidelines. --NrDg 02:03, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia's policies are ridiculous! I try to contribute positively to Wikipedia and people like you come along and crush my dream of making Wikipedia a better place. Well, I am here to tell you that you'll be losing a very valuable editor soon. This isn't the first time I have gotten a reply like the one above! DemiLovato15 (talk) 02:10, 6 May 2008 (UTC)