User talk:Orangemike

Hans Christian King

Hi there. I'd like to know why this page got deleted so quickly even when I put the hangon tag on it. I was in the process of adding it, and had to answer a call at work. There is a valid body of experience here. I had intended it to look like this one: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Van_Praagh but you yanked it far too quickly for me to build it to that level. I request that it be undeleted so I can improve it to academic standards. user:curtisall 13:37, 13 May 2008 (EST)

Deletion of article on common defenition use of "Monotone"

The deletion log showed you as pulling this stub Monotone (common) that I started. I'd like to know how to proceed to convince you to revert this. I fail to see why this topic that companies spend a lot of effort dealing with, is mentioned as the focus of many Osha effords, merrits entire days and weeks in seminars on public speaking and education/training is "patent nonsense". None of the people above are dealing with mathematics, geometry, economics, voting, and they are not talking about music of only one note either. There's way more to the topic than a dictionary definition. : Maybe your opinion arose from a difference on view how Wikipedia articles should be created. I liken the process to product development. No one is asked to put a finished product on the table including references to all aplicable standards. What you do is throw out ideas and get experts in each area to flesh out details, then you see if it flies. I don't have all the answers, but I think that creating a page and asking the experts with access to all those "members only" articles to supply details, is a way to make information on this topic accessible to those looking to wikipedia for information. The label (common) may also have contributed to having the stub classified as "nonsense", however I'm not sure what label would be better suited. I'm open to suggestions. Labeling it (psychology) might not jibe with the experts' system of labeling {ergonomics) would not include the other 2 uses outlined above, which are closely related. Although each might merit it's separate page later on, I feel we should keep them together till the topics have grown to a size warranting that step, rather than having 3 stubs (where even having one is now being disputed)  : I hope i have managed to present my arguments in a reasonable way, although I admit to being quite incensed by that labeling and process, as you might have gathered if you took the trouble to read the talk page. Having people at companies spend lots of time in meetings and gathering on a certain topic might not necessarily mean it isn't "patent nonsense" (after all we pay lots of people big salaries with little to show for it :-) it would however be nice to have a page to see what they are up to.  : Looking forward to having the sub undeleted or your comments as to why not. Lisa4edit (talk) 20:31, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

How come you think that what that article tried to get the word "to mean something it doesn't"??? as I tried to explain above, none of the existing articles covers some of the most "common" usages of "Monotone". Or would you kindly explain how the meaning used by the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work or Occupational Safety and Health Administration or the other 2 usages are in any way covered by any of the existing articles. I'm willing to listen to arguments, but I will resist having an article deleted just because someone "feels" that it's not useful to them. I don't "feel" anything in Monotone (software) is going to help me explain what makes a speech monotonous. Monotone class theorem is not going to help figure out how to change existing jobs to meet new work safety requirements. Monotone preferences will not aid me in creating exercises that are not monotonous while being beneficially repetitive. I'd be most interested what your "feeling" is based on, exactly what did you think in the suggested examples does not mean "monotone"? As I also explained I don't have all the answers, but I certainly have the questions and I know that none of the wikipedia articles to date cover them and I equally know that there are answers out there because otherwise an amazing number of people would waste their working life on "patent nonsense that is forced to mean something it doesn't mean." --Lisa4edit (talk) 00:38, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

thanks!

...for the constant csd-checking. Every time i nominate something i seem to check my watchlist and find you've deleted it within a couple of minutes :). Ironholds (talk) 00:11, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Deletion of page "Western Carolina University Academic Programs". What about a listing of college majors/minors is blatant advertising ? Glovejr (talk) 00:29, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

butting in here, the college has a website, I think. There's general agreement that this sort of list is not encyclopedic content, certainly not by itself. It could have been speedied equally on other grounds, such as being a list of links and nothing more. I'm much more reluctant than OM to speedy-delete articles, but I think it a good enough speedy. There is really zero chance of making an acceptable article out of it. DGG (talk) 03:51, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Liberalism/Additional_reading deletion

While I personally support the deletion, you speedied something that had earlier an inconclusive AfD, so that may cause some sparks to fly. Scott.wheeler (talk) 14:47, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Paul Diamond.

Alright, sounds good to me. Logster's edits seem suspicious to me too... · AndonicO ^Engage. 16:21, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Justin K Kazmierczak

Just thought I'd say hello. Thanks for helping me out a bit, one day I'll submit somthing you can't delete lol. Nice to know how fast this comunity works :) Nice to meet you! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Justinkaz (talk • contribs) 14:06, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Plastic Ingenuity Help

Last year a good friend of mine and I had a class with a professor that went on and on about a company that he worked with through the university. My friend came on to Wikipedia and noticed the company did not have a page so he started researching it further because it seemed interesting. We then both talked to the prof. outside of class, and got more information. I guess my friend tried to create a wikipedia page for Plastic Ingenuity, but it was deleted within a day because of a lack of significance. He and I looked at what was presented, and we understand that there was a lack of references present, and that the information should have been organized differently. He and I have been working on revisions, and have a great new page in our opinions, so I was just asking you for some advice to make sure it doesnt happen again. Any help you could give us would be greatly appreciated. Allstar11

double voting?

Hi. You voted twice here. In addition, in your second "delete" vote you proposed to "redirect". So I'm a bit confused with your proposal?--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 17:38, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Re: The unfortunate misunderstanding

Also sorry from my side; I should have realized that this name sounds like a URL. So fortunately everything ended up fine. :-) I just requested to have my name changed to Timosch_xyz on WP:CHU. PS: I had the chance to enjoy beautiful Milwaukee half a year ago. - Timosch.de (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 18:28, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Celeste Dinucci

Mike what are your thoughts on this article. WHy do we need a biography of a gameshow contestant?? SHouldn't it be merged into a section in the main articles summarizing the shows successful contestants?? Probably some people will think this is what wikipedia is about, but an encyclopedia in my view should not have biogrpahical articles on people like this ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ ^$1,000,000? 20:26, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Radioo Naming Conventions

I tried to move the Information of the Radio Station from the Callsign to its Name and I had a very hard time with it because some users undid what I did. I have nothing to do, but to give up those things. Now, I finally accept those Radio Naming Conventions. 203.87.181.218 (talk) 22:09, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

KPHX

Hi!

Help me please?

I work for KPHX. So I am not supposed to edit it...

Well, Neither is KingDaevid, who has a show on here and he made this edit recently;

http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=KPHX_%28AM%29&curid=4535092&diff=215467357&oldid=212200503

Could you revert it for me please and make any other changes you think are appropriate?

Thanks so much!!!!

Direct Action Gets Results.

--BenBurch (talk) 01:36, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

You are clueless

I know Hdayejr and you have no business running your mouth when you only have knowledge of his war with Steve here last summer. You only know that much and nothing more. Makes you look just a bit ignorant. Get lost.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Holderowner (talk • contribs) — Holderowner (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

Violet Blue & editor KathrynA

From that list of edits it would appear to me that this person *is* the author the article is about - new press mentions are added so regularly that only the author could know about them. I think I am going to watch that article like a hawk, and if you have time, I'd wish you would too. Thanks! --BenBurch (talk) 16:51, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Hi Orange!

Cause the line after your signature told me to do so! How's it going? --UWMSports (talk) 19:29, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Oh, absolutely! I know I'll find you!!! How often you there? --UWMSports (talk) 19:32, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Sounds good, I've already left for the day today, but I'll definitely have to find you! A snack sounds good.--UWMSports (talk) 19:54, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for your speedy action

on the William Wasz article. He's dead, so BLP doesn't strictly apply, but with no reliable sources, lots of derogatory info and dubious notability, the page was still an embarrassment to the project. David in DC (talk) 20:25, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Fan Fiction templating

I was placing the template on certain articles that have some relationship with fan fiction. It is true that some of them are not related 100%. Yet, I beleive that if there is some aspect of the article that could be an interest to the WikiProject Fan Fiction it ought to be tagged as being part of the project. Take Michael Jordan for example. He is part of the WikiProject for baseball, but only spent a year in the minors a baseball player. --Pinkkeith (talk) 21:37, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

'bout nutshack

hey, orange mike, uh... why did you delete the article? I mean, how come the other stuff that i read made it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Claymore007 (talk • contribs) 01:33, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

My prophetic powers

Why, thank you! I gained them after being exposed to the radiation from a meteorite of pure Vandalium! - Vianello (talk) 01:44, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Mohamed Abdelwahab Abdelfattah

Hello -- you're doing a great job. I was looking today for the article on Mohamed Abdelwahab Abdelfattah, on which I had worked painstakingly for months, and found it entirely missing. After about an hour of searching, I was finally able to determine that you had deleted the article entirely (?) here, without any discussion. This is one of the most prominent Egyptian composers of contemporary classical music under 50, and hence one of the most prominent Arabic or Middle Eastern composers of such music, and, as such, I'd very much appreciate your graciousness in restoring this page so that this individual may be properly documented in our encyclopedia. Thanks so much in advance for this. Badagnani (talk) 02:33, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Bodies of Water deletion

I'm not clear on why the Bodies of Water page got deleted. They've been reviewed by the Rolling Stone, Spin, Pitchfork, and a bunch of top music blogs (as I noted) -- which I would think would fulfill criterion #1 of the music notability guidelines. In addition, they've released two albums on Secretly Canadian and have one coming out in July (criterion #5). Also, they have "at least one member who was once a part of or later joined a band that is otherwise notable" (Adam Siegel) -- criterion #6. All this stuff was noted in the article. I'm not trying to be a jerk; I understand the need to police this kind of thing, but I think they are as deserving of an article as any of the other Secretly Canadian bands, as most of them already have got. Dulcettones (talk) 03:09, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your help on the page! Dulcettones (talk) 14:16, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

clay is now not climbing on a pole

So i had a page called Clay was climbing on the pole and it got deleted, either could i have that back up or have a screenshot of it? thanks very much dude. I can see how you didnt want it on wikipedia.Jrpibb (talk) 04:12, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Bimbo Deluxe

Hi Orangemike, I've just come back from holiday to find you've deleted a page I wrote years ago about a bar in Melbourne called Bimbo Deluxe. Can I ask why you decided to delete it? Thanks, Matnkat (talk) 13:08, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Point of Divergence

Nah I don't think so. Omission of the group from the article I don't think takes anything away from what the article is trying to say about a POD. Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 14:03, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Yeah so am I. I even submitted some of my alternate history work to Changing the Times and the Alterante History Wiki. I haven't heard of your friend's group though until I saw that article. Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 14:11, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

What do you know the group does still exist, check out the change to the article. Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 15:51, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:User Page Design Center

I see you deleted Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:User Page Design Center as a user request just now. Is that allowable for withdrawn for deletion discussions if others have left comments? I only ask because I contributed an opinion in the discussion before it was deleted. Should it have just been closed as "withdrawn" instead of deleted like that? Metros (talk) 14:13, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Request review of deletion of Progress Application Partner

This page you deleted today after it was marked for speedy deletion defined a certain kind of software developer for the benefit of similar software developers as well as users of that kind of software. As a resource to netizens, being able to understand the terms and roles involved is important for their own purposes. The page did not advocate any product, company or individuals. It defined the term "Progress Application Partner" as something more specific than simply "independent software vendor" —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dlucy67 (talk • contribs) 15:36, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

I had never heard of the term "Progress Application Partner" as a type of software developer, and it doesn't appear to be any buzzoword, it appears to be only a company program --Enric Naval (talk) 16:05, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

BucApella=

How is a BucAppella page any different from other A Cappella group pages on wikipedia? —Preceding unsigned comment added by ABusa (talk • contribs) 15:51, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

User:Moment Theory

Hi there; I know that you have been an admin for longer than I have, and I will defer to your judgement. This user, to whom you gave an {{indefblock}}. is asking for a review. He claims to be only a fan of the band, not a member of it. I have no way of telling, but I have a feeling that he may be telling the truth. Would you care to review? --Anthony.bradbury^"talk" 18:36, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

The Ordinary Radicals deletion

Hello! Just today we here at my production company have been attempting to post articles on both The Ordinary Radicals as well as Jamie Moffett, the director of the film. The former entry was deleted due to conflict of interest violations as well as being considered promotional material. As the creators of the movie I am unclear as to how we are supposed to post an article without it being considered as such. At the moment we are the most qualified to provide information about it since the movie is currently in production. I realize that I forgot to cite a reference in the first iteration of the article, but as I was attempting to fix this in my User page (User:Chandlervision, I understand the reason for the username ban as it is also the name of my pseudo-company) that was also deleted. We have a fairly strong following of fans that is growing, and if we can provide them with a foundation to edit then we are confident that it will be fleshed out by them, as well as our staff providing the information that the fans cannot. I have read the page and editing guidelines but it's possible I missed some details or nuances. I simply don't see what was wrong with the entry, especially the one for Jamie Moffett who runs the company and would like to be included for context. One other thing to note is that our movie is not, and will not be copywrited, so the infringement seems non-existant. I'd appreciate a response or even suggestions as to how we can avoid breaking the guidelines for a future entry. Thanks for your time! --Stevemotion (talk) 19:46, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Question

Is it kosher for SportsMaster to be doing this? SportsMaster's Contributions. Scroll down or hit next at this point. He wrote notes on several users boards about the vote over the AD from Cleveland State. It's relatively neutral wording, but these might be people who he has grown to know and work with on certain articles. What do you think? --GoHuskies9904 (talk) 20:39, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

He recruited a bunch of other users by leaving them messages on their talk page to get them to the AfD vote. --GoHuskies9904 (talk) 02:40, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

PLEASE!

Please could you put "The Comics (band)" page back on Wikipedia as they now have a record deal and are a support act for the band 'The Wombats'. PLEASE could you put it back on? -- CrackersTeam (talk) 23:17, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

User:Lenatalia

The spamming indef block [1] seems a little....harsh. She created the nonsense article once, yes? Darkspots (talk) 02:20, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

create2 warn. Bored girl in her twenties. Hey, I see your point, too, though. No big deal. I guess I just like to see folks get a warning shot across the bow before the indef unless they really do something egregious. Darkspots (talk) 02:36, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

I appreciate you taking the time to explain your thinking to me. That make a lot of sense. Darkspots (talk) 02:43, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

WHY MY PAGE

HI I AM NEW TO WIKI I HAVE ALREADY HAD MY PAGE DELETED AND YOU DELTING IT DID NOT MAKE ME ANY HAPPYIER AND I DONT KNOW WHAT COUNTRY YOUR IN BUT IN MY COUNTRY IT IS CURRENTLY 3:42 AM AND I AM 15 SO IM SORRY BUT IT DID NOT HELP ME —Preceding unsigned comment added by HACKER1993 (talk • contribs) 02:43, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

You're right...

This is a strange case. This may or may not be the same person. If it is, there's a serious COI issue. If not, he/she sure is a fan of this person. Either way, there's some assertion of notability, but hoo boy, trying to unearth it is a gargantuan task. I'm not de facto against an article, but certainly not this one. Oh, well...it's the weekend.  :) Thanks for all your good work. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 03:13, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my page. --Nlu (talk) 04:30, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Wikispedia

For real? ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ ^$1,000,000? 21:31, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Dionysus Explorer Scout Unit

Why was this page deleted? I put the reason for its stay on the page and the talk page. It's an important part of the scout's history! I demand it be put back! Cadan ap Tomos (talk) 14:45, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

I agree! Impeach Bushco and his minions...

I am glad that you aren't a lefty lib. 72.60.178.71 (talk) 19:25, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

OfficeArrow - Kevin Cannella

Hello, I tried to make this page last week and you deleted it for blatant advertising. Is there a way I could discuss the article and which parts specifically are advertising? I had no intension of advertising OfficeArrow on Wikipedia, simply just add the page, similarly to Facebook or LinkedIn or Ning.

Thank you,

Kevin--Kevincannella (talk) 19:40, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

movie

I am a new movie producer Right out of collage and I think and I made a wikipedia page about a movie that is getting made and is very —Preceding unsigned comment added by JackieTeal (talk • contribs) 00:05, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Ed Biado

Mind taking a look at this thread as well as the DRV? Hoary had just restored it. It wasn't a G7 (it wasn' the author who requested it) and wasn't an A7, which was why I took it to DRV. I was *trying* avoid a wheel war. Thoughts? _{TravellingCari}^{the Busy Bee} 01:52, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Can I ask why you reverted the page for Tell City, In after I added information about the city. And added the place for what I was going to put about the type of Government and council, the parks and recreation and so forth, other cities pages have those kinds of information, why can't I add that for the city I live in. It wasn't any thing malicious, did you even look at the additions I made or did you just revert it cause I made it. Constitutional congress (talk) 03:54, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Bettina Shaw-Lawrence

Have made as many changes as possible to improve the article. However it is difficult for the one writing the article and whose first Wikipedia article it is to pin point all the mistakes. If there is anything missing or if you believe that the article now meets most Wikipedia requirements, I would be most grateful if you could let me know. It would be so nice to be able to delete some of those tags. Regards, Boselawrence (talk) 08:03, 3 June 2008 (UTC)Boselawrence

Richard Stern

Hello, I understand you don't delete pages simply because someone has retired, but surely you can respect the wishes of the subject of the page itself; my professional life and aspirations are being severely threatened by my internet presence and it would mean a great deal to my future to have this page deleted. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lazydork (talk • contribs) 14:58, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Frank Marshall Davis

The assertion was made by Gerald Home, NOT a blogger, but have become notable because of the repetition of Loudon and Kincaid. This 'audit trail' is therefore part of the notability.Flatterworld (talk) 15:04, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

See articles about other political scandals. Yes, it is indeed encyclopedic to dissect them. The section is about this 'purported link', and therefore requires an explanation of how it became a purported link. Bring it up on the Talk page of the article is you like. Flatterworld (talk) 15:14, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Richard Stern - History Rewrite?

You stated in my request to have my page deleted that I can't "rewrite history." I would understand that if Jimmy Carter or Madonna tried to delete their page, but I was a D-List youtube account who contributed nothing to the greater consciousness of society, pop culture, science, or even history. If I was ever notable, which is open to discussion, those days are long past and my page is a complete waste of space. In fact, wikipedia should be ashamed to even consider having an entry for such an utter and total nobody. Please reconsider; this has absolutely no effect on you, nor will you remember this in a week, but this sticks with me forever. Thank you.

Krause 450 (talk · contribs)

Hi Mike. I take responsibility for my unblocks, and will monitor his contributions. If he doesn't follow the rules, I'll be the first to block him. Neıl 龱 15:44, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the help!

Thanks for the quick reply to my question. "citation for personal communication" [2] I have another question about it and I couldn't figure out how to enter it on that page (This is my first day editing). The question is this: If personal experience can't be verified and thus can't be cited (makes sense), then is there a way to remove "needs citation" from the article? It seems a little weird if the information, by nature of its content, can't have a citation - to require one for it. Say, if the New York Times happen to order a DVD from the director and then published a story about it, I could reference that NYT's article, but in fact it was the personal experience of the Times journalist. Which we agree can't be verified. I understand reputation and why people trust some published sources (and not others). But what I'm wondering is how to address this particular situation. Since I happen to know that the statement is true and I would like to help that particular wikipedia article. Thanks again Orangemike.

DoctorRocket (talk) 18:29, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Vandals for blocking

Block these vandals please:

Here and User talk:Scoobydoo487, Both have had at least three of four warnings and some of their vandalsim has gone undetected. Things would be a lot easier if I had admin tools. It would save me pestering admins all the time. ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ ^$1,000,000? 21:15, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Freddy Vs Ghostbusters - Original Research?

How is it that an article about the highly notable film Freddy Vs Ghostbusters is considered "original research"? Mozepy (talk) 00:02, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

But you are the one who said "original research". Mozepy (talk) 03:16, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Hub bike coop

Look Mike, I really don't know why you deleted my Hub Bike Coop article. I'm pretty pissed because it has now been deleted TWO TIMES. My recommendation for you to be CONSTRUCTIVE rather than DESTRUCTIVE; make articles instead of delete them. We did our best to provide an adequate amount of information and references, yet you still deleted it. Please reply to me via my talk page regarding this issue. Believe me, Mike, the Hub Bike Coop will NEVER go away. Just test me. -Ldud ل داد 12:55, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

WE Youth Political organization

Hi! I've just been given notice by a friend that you wrote there, December 11, 2007, about WE Youth Political organization: «This article looks like an advertisement/party platform to me, but the editor/guardian refuses to address my concerns. Could you take a look at it? I don't read Russian (or Ukrainian), but I suspect the articles cited don't really talk about this organization at all (or not meaningfully)». I see this article has been deleted six days later, probably for the best…
Sorry for being so late answering. Unfortunately, my long-time pal and colleague Ivan Korenyuk died October 6, 2007.
Cordially,
✓ Kanġi Oĥanko (talk) 13:12, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

I greatly appreciate the words you gave me about Ivan. I still mourn him. We've been always together on all paths and in the same “adventures”, including our country's independance and the Orange Revolution.
Sincere thanks to you. ✓ Kanġi Oĥanko (talk) 18:39, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

notability question

While on NP patrol, I encountered this page and made an attempt to clean it up. It appears to just barely pass the notability requirements to me, but I'm not sure exactly if it does or not. I was wondering if you would look it over a little and tell me what you think. Thanks for the help. Thingg^⊕⊗ 18:03, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

About Héctor Zumbado

Hello, I just saw that you challenged the neutrality & tone/style of Héctor Zumbado. Please discuss the issue in the article's talk page, so we can fix it. Thanks for your concern!

User:Alfredo J. Herrera Lago. —Preceding comment was added at 21:13, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Urtbox

hangon

Please dont delete urtbox pages i just need to fixe information. i dont now wath is wrong whit the last messages ? ihave not put link ? thanks for your help Martin —Preceding unsigned comment added by Merikavril9 (talk • contribs) — Merikavril9 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

This is a blatant advertisement for a new, non-notable website. It has been deleted three times now. Please do not try to re-create it until and unless the website becomes notable. --Orange Mike | Talk 01:17, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Black Starfish...

Could you please protect this page, after deleting it again, as I do not think these kids are going to stop re-starting the article. I've pointed them in the direction of WP:SOAP and WP:N, but that did not seem to slow their efforts any. - Adolphus79 (talk) 02:06, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Sable Starr

I see you deleted my page just as I was about to add more references. Why did you do that, may I ask? Sable was one of the most popular groupies of the era, far more so than that Connnie Hamzy from Arkansas, who has her own article at Wikipedia. I had another article on an LA glam punk band deleted just because the editor had never heard of them. That's the problem when editors come from other regions and aren't familiar with people who were extremely popular in California, as was Sable. I well remember having seen her around everywhere and the rock magazines were full of her photos. Just type her name in Google and see how often she comes up. Could you explain why you deleted my article? Thanks.jeanne (talk) 05:13, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Actually, I've written few articles about living persons, most of my articles are about medieval women who have been dead for many centuries. IN fact, I have spent much of my time sourcing these historical people from many sources. Perhaps you are biased towards me due to our conflicting political opinions. I have not failed to notice that all the critcism I receive on Wikipedia come from people who have stated their left- wing POV. I, am openly right-wing as can be clearly seen on my User page. I am a right-wing, Monarchist, which is bound to attract hostility from those on the other side of the political divide. I don't think you realise just how notable Sable Starr was seeing as you did not live in Los Angeles at the time as I did, but I really don't care for your insinuations that my articles are poorly-sourced. Have you, perchance, read all my articles?jeanne (talk) 14:06, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Can you please point out one article that I have written where I sourced Astrotheme? You have only been reading my talk pages not my articlesjeanne (talk) 14:35, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

re: Noelke Law Firm Article

I get paid, the article gets deleted, and my boss probably never looks to see what happened. Everyone wins; I hope it didn't take too much of your time (I have added Wikipedia to my list of charitable contributions -again- in penance). I have it saved on a sub-page of mine, and if he ever does anything notable, I'll add meat and repost it. I suspect this will happen someday, but as of this date, I personally agree that the firm is not notable. I tried to make that clear on my user page. Rule11 (talk) 17:28, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Regards about GV 99.9

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits for GV 99.9.

I undid what you did in GV 99.9. You erased the History, Profile and the sister stations of GV 99.9 by undoing the whole thing, but now I UNDID WHAT YOU DID and the History, Profile and the Sister Stations are there.

DO NOT undo what I did to GV 99.9 because it is FINAL.

ZRMontez (talk) 12:12, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

You should be aware of...

this discussion, but I would suggest that although your evidence and observations might be of value, it might be thought inappropriate for you to be the closing admin. Kevin McE (talk) 08:23, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Northwestern University Men's Basketball

Please restore this page. It is of a notable Big Ten basketball team and due to your deletion, it is the only Big Ten men's basketball team to not have a page on Wikipedia. Furthermore, your reason for deletion is inapproriate. The information relating to the team would not be nonsense and if it was nonsense, it would most likely be due to vandalism, in which case deletion would not have been the proper course of action.Eb3686 20:31, 8 June 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eb3686 (talk • contribs)