Jump to content

Talk:Chakravala method

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Rumping (talk | contribs) at 15:03, 14 August 2008 (Details: 61 and 67). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconMathematics Stub‑class Low‑priority
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-priority on the project's priority scale.
WikiProject iconIndia Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Details

Would be great if someone could add some actual details about how this method works - especially as the article claims it is very simple. Gandalf61 08:16, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I just added an "example", except that it's way too long, and I gave up before the answer was actually reached, because it's just so tedious. (Simple, but tedious.) If someone adds a proof that this method actually works, without any ad-hoc final steps or handwaving, I might add an implementation in C; but if we can't prove that it will terminate, there's not much point in pursuing that route. --Quuxplusone 22:48, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It looks as if the is a little "bait and switch" between 61 and 67, as well as being unclear whether the 61 case was solved in the 7th, 9th or 12th centuries. --Rumping (talk) 15:03, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]