Talk:Nice (Unix)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Nice and renice

and the difference between renice and nice is????? - that should certainly be in the article, since both link there. --62.41.129.19 20:51, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I just came across this page today and I'd be glad to update it with a section for 'renice.' I don't think that quite merits its own article...but the way it's setup now, with 'renice' just pointing to 'nice,' doesn't seem very professional.

Haha, I'm new to this Wiki thing. =p Andewulfe 05:07, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Redo this page

This really needs to be redone. There is some incorrect info in this article. nice goes from 19 to -19. See Unix SystemV by Ken Sobel. Also see your Linux documentation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spectre65 (talk • contribs) 04:25, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That depends on the OS - AIX nice manpage shows this:

ADJUST is 10 by default.  Range goes from -20 (highest priority) to 19 (lowest).

--Unixguy 10:52, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

But what does it say for renice(1)? My nice(1) page agrees with yours but the renice page says the range is -20 to 20. Additionally, my kernel defines PRIO_MIN=-20 and PRIO_MAX=20. It may be that PRIO_MIN<=niceness<PRIO_MAX, but I don't see anything to that effect anywhere. hikeda (talk) 23:18, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

C bindings

I'm afraid I don't understand the C example - is it intended to indicate the manpage? Because it isn't C code; but 'man getpriority' on my system gives

    int
    getpriority(int which, int who);

in section 2, so getpriority(2) would make sense but no with that signature. 86.6.2.185 23:33, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]