User talk:76.10.75.168

August 2008

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Pedro Winter page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Douglasr007 (talk) 08:09, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Pedro Winter. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Nsaa (talk) 10:06, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Metros (talk) 19:18, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You know, if you don't tell me what I did wrong, I don't see what I can learn from it.--76.10.75.168 (talk) 02:47, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You were disruptive by trying to bait and taunt him. Metros (talk) 02:52, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

He left me a similar message, and if you look at his archives, he has a long history of baiting and taunting people. I was just trying to humble him a bit.--76.10.75.168 (talk) 03:41, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And you don't have to be disruptive and obstinate in order to make a point. Oh wait, yes you do, you're an anonymous "editor". JuJube (talk) 05:46, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're really not helping your case here, friend.--76.10.75.168 (talk) 05:59, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for attempting to harass other users. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. --VS ^talk 06:34, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

76.10.75.168 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Well, it's kind of difficult to argue, since you won't tell me exactly what I did wrong. But if this is related to the creation of that new infobox, I did so because the user in question is, in fact, a pedophile, a fact which he publicly admits to. If Wikipedia has a rule protecting people who like to have sex with children, I apologize for my ignorance.

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Well, it's kind of difficult to argue, since you won't tell me exactly what I did wrong. But if this is related to the creation of that new infobox, I did so because the user in question is, in fact, a pedophile, a fact which he publicly admits to. If Wikipedia has a rule protecting people who like to have sex with children, I apologize for my ignorance. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Well, it's kind of difficult to argue, since you won't tell me exactly what I did wrong. But if this is related to the creation of that new infobox, I did so because the user in question is, in fact, a pedophile, a fact which he publicly admits to. If Wikipedia has a rule protecting people who like to have sex with children, I apologize for my ignorance. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Well, it's kind of difficult to argue, since you won't tell me exactly what I did wrong. But if this is related to the creation of that new infobox, I did so because the user in question is, in fact, a pedophile, a fact which he publicly admits to. If Wikipedia has a rule protecting people who like to have sex with children, I apologize for my ignorance. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.