Talk:Goodison Park

	North West England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Merseyside, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Merseyside-related articles. In so doing it works and collaborates with its mother project WikiProject UK Geography. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Please also feel free to join in the discussions on the project's talk page.MerseysideWikipedia:WikiProject MerseysideTemplate:WikiProject MerseysideMerseyside articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Football: England Start‑class Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	English football portal This article is supported by the English football task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Goodison Park Outline by df2k2

I can add this to the article if there is a shown interest.

File:Everton outline df2k2.png

I think I have to remove the image in the center, can anyone confirm?

I show interest. Oh ya and Goodison should have four stars from uefa. It classifies under four stars in theUefa Stadia Listings. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Go everton (talk • contribs) 23:22, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Getting a bit out of control

This article is getting increasingly POV (phrases such as "first big rich club", "best club ground", "...steal the identity") with no citations to back up. Other, less contentious stuff, is also sorely lacking in sources. Dancarney (talk) 06:50, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

remove or tag them, and after tag if nothing provided the remove. --Boothy443 | trácht ar 17:04, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I see nothing out of control. The page has been greatly enhanced over the past few days. It is far more professional. Point out what you consider contentious? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.66.56.141 (talk) 22:54, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I never stated that anything was contentious. However there have been a lot of additions of uncited material - see WP:CITATION. Many of these additions use language that does not adhere to Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy. "Made Anfield an international standard ground..." what does international standard mean, particularly in the context of the 1890s? Goodison Park is described as "superior " with no citation. The Top Balc is decribed as having "enhanced" the Main Stand, with no citation. This is just a small selection. Dancarney (talk) 08:26, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]