Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Law/JD curriculum task force

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Agradman (talk | contribs) at 20:43, 2 August 2009 (typo). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome to the JD curriculum task force of WikiProject Law


CASEBOOK subpages

This list seeks to group casebooks into the recognizable categories of course title & year. Please propose potentially confusing changes at the talk page.

I think we might eventually settle for broader categories, e.g. "corporate classes," "1L classes," "constitutional classes", "intellectual property," "international law," "litigation," etc.

Column-generating template families

The templates listed here are not interchangeable. For example, using {{col-float}} with {{col-end}} instead of {{col-float-end}} would leave a <div>...</div> open, potentially harming any subsequent formatting.

Column templates
Type Family
Handles wiki
table code?
Responsive/
mobile suited
Start template Column divider End template
Float "col-float" Yes Yes {{col-float}} {{col-float-break}} {{col-float-end}}
"columns-start" Yes Yes {{columns-start}} {{column}} {{columns-end}}
Columns "div col" Yes Yes {{div col}} {{div col end}}
"columns-list" No Yes {{columns-list}} (wraps div col)
Flexbox "flex columns" No Yes {{flex columns}}
Table "col" Yes No {{col-begin}},
{{col-begin-fixed}} or
{{col-begin-small}}
{{col-break}} or
{{col-2}} .. {{col-5}}
{{col-end}}

Can template handle the basic wiki markup {| | || |- |} used to create tables? If not, special templates that produce these elements (such as {{(!}}, {{!}}, {{!!}}, {{!-}}, {{!)}})—or HTML tags (<table>...</table>, <tr>...</tr>, etc.)—need to be used instead.

Resources

Professional briefs.
  • Paraphrase from "High Court Case Summaries," "Casenote Legal Briefs", "Lexis Headnotes," etc.
Student outlines and casebriefs.
Analysis.
  • "Shepardize" individual cases on Lexis Nexis, for heavily-footnoted treatises and law review articles. Paraphrase, don't infringe.

Young caselaw articles should, at bare minimum, consist of case briefs. WP:SCOTUS employs the following article outline, and we should not diverge from it without their consensus. (In the long run, WP:LAW should have a "manual of style task force"/"Wikibluebook task force", whose members determine the standards for article layout, citation usage, template usage, etc. for all law-related content.)

Todo

Participants

  1. Andrew Gradman talk/WP:Hornbook 18:30, 28 July 2009 (UTC) (founder)[reply]
  2. Elliott Ash talk/WP:Hornbook 23:55, 01 August 2009 (UTC) (co-founder)[reply]
  3. Bearian (talk) 12:24, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Pharos (talk) 03:46, 31 July 2009 (UTC) Not a law student, but I'd be glad to help from Wikimedia New York City and reaching out to the Students for Free Culture chapter at Columbia.[reply]
  5. Lawyer2b (talk) 05:03, 31 July 2009 (UTC) Will do what I can with limited time available. Love the project![reply]
  6. DAFMM (talk), very interesting. 31st July 2009.
  7. Cdogsimmons (talk) 14:22, 31 July 2009 (UTC) I look forward to participating.[reply]
  8. SWATJester Son of the Defender 23:13, 31 July 2009 (UTC) 3L at American University, focus on IP law.[reply]
  9. Ramsquire (throw me a line) 23:21, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Riotrocket8676 You gotta problem with that? 17:21, 1 August 2009 (UTC) Am a High School student, but want to be a lawyer![reply]
  11. Ute in DC (talk) 06:26, 2 August 2009 (UTC) Focus on criminal law.[reply]
  12. Eastlaw talk ⁄ contribs 06:58, 2 August 2009 (UTC) I will try to accomplish something here. I am not sure how much time I will have in the near-term future though.[reply]

Other stuff

Categories

Templates

For main project templates, see the main project page for WikiProject Law.

Infobox template

Stub templates

Featured/Good content

Since few of our articles are of broad public interest, I currently feel (July 28 2009) that we should be aiming to bring articles up to "Good Article" status. Once we establish a consensus on the discussion page, we'll revise this text to be more objective.