Jump to content

User talk:Dragonmaster88

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Dragonmaster88 (talk | contribs) at 20:10, 12 August 2009. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. WP:PA removed. Do not replace it. If you do, I'll protect this page and you will no longer be able to talk William M. Connolley (talk) 20:17, 13 December 2008 (UTC)][reply]

License tagging for File:1030e9f20c3a flip.png

Thanks for uploading File:1030e9f20c3a flip.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 05:08, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ok =O-O=;

Edit summary

You can't do this. Assume good faith please. Prodego talk 05:59, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
sorry about that, it is just that people like that really tick me off =^-^=;;; --"I am an oktau and a baka at times but deny proven facts and you got a fight" comment added by Dragonmaster88 (talkcontribs) 06:04, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I know what you mean, it can get stressful sometimes. When it gets too much, it is nice to take a break. I might take a short one soon myself. Prodego talk 06:18, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
will do that sir. =^-^=;;--"I am an oktau and a baka at times but deny proven facts and you got a fight" comment added by Dragonmaster88 (talkcontribs) 06:19, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You too, have a nice day, let me know if you need anything. Cheers, Prodego talk 06:29, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

School Rumble: 3rd Semester - OVA vs third season

Hi there. There has been a lot of recent editing on the topic of School Rumble: 3rd Semester, starting on the List of School Rumble episodes article before spilling over onto the School Rumble one. Much of this editing appears to be in the form of selective editing to reinforce a particular belief regarding the status of the two episodes in question. Such editing is not especially productive. As per WP:DR might I suggest that you both discuss the matter, in an attempt to correctly list the episodes. If this cannot be accomplished then perhaps a third opinion should be requested; see WP:3. I've started a discussion on Talk:List_of_School_Rumble_episodes#Third Semester: OVA vs third season if there's anything you'd like to contribute regarding your point of view on this matter. Cyclonius (talk) 07:30, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ghost Hunters

Just curious as to what aspect of my edit you viewed as controversial enough to require a talk page discussion - as I'm not sure what part of the change you feel needs to be discussed.

The only two changes were the sequence of some paragraphs (no change to the wording of the paragraph that was moved), and to change the original sentence "In earlier episodes, part of the hour showed Jason and Grant during their plumbing job or personal lives but that has diminished since then", which aside from being poorly written sentence structure, also contains original research in determining the frequency from earlier episodes to newer episodes. The revised sentence instead read "Portions of some episodes portray Jason and Grant involved with their plumbing job or personal lives, but this varies by episode and is not always included." - which removes the original research of frequency trends and simply states that it exists and varies by episode. Is the issue with the word "show" v. "portrays"? If so, I have no strong attachment to either word - if it's less controversial to say "shows", I have no problem with that. --- Barek (talkcontribs) - 17:53, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

admin

For A&M WikiProject, I know User:Dinoguy1000 frequents it, however before seeking to do anything if its content dispute and not actual vandalism make certain you have tried to resolve things.Jinnai 08:14, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

yes I will try with Dino thank you =^-^=--"I am an oktau and a baka at times but deny proven facts and you got a fight" comment added by Dragonmaster88 (talkcontribs) 18:52, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Just so you know, we seem to have a pretty high admin:user ratio in WP:ANIME - in addition to myself, there's Sephiroth BCR, Nihonjoe, and G.A.S, and these are just the ones I can think of offhand. =) ダイノガイ千?!? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 07:58, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
oh okay then I will try to contacted them when I have a problem that requires an adim =^-^=--"I am an oktau and a baka at times but deny proven facts and you got a fight" comment added by Dragonmaster88 (talkcontribs) 18:24, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Undoing edits

Just an FYI, when you undo someone's edit that is not vandalism, you are obligated to provide an edit summary/reason for your revert. Thanks. :)

BTW, you were correct to revert my last edit.--Flash176 (talk) 20:21, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

are you being sarcastic? =O-o=--"I am an oktau and a baka at times but deny proven facts and you got a fight" comment added by Dragonmaster88 (talkcontribs) 05:06, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No, if I had believed you were wrong and I was right, I would have undone your undo.--Flash176 (talk) 12:50, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
ok then =^-^=--"I am an oktau and a baka at times but deny proven facts and you got a fight" comment added by Dragonmaster88 (talkcontribs) 17:20, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Ghostbusters video game

FOR CRYING OUT LOUD

If you have a trust issue, just look at the credits!

03:34, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

thats a weird becuase I never haerd any Funimation voices, and I and very good at spotting them out. oh and this one is good to use too--"I am an oktau and a baka at times but deny proven facts and you got a fight" comment added by Dragonmaster88 (talkcontribs) 09:03, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

about vigo

um how exactly did you fight vigo? because I never came across a battle with him when played on ps2 and the only things I see related to him is the painting in basement of the firehouse and tobin's spirit guide page.=O-o=--"I am an oktau and a baka at times but deny proven facts and you got a fight" comment added by Dragonmaster88 (talkcontribs) 17:09, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You dont' fight him, all he does is spew insults and threats in the game from his protrait. Fractyl (talk) 03:56, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
really? I will have to check that out--"I am an oktau and a baka at times but deny proven facts and you got a fight" comment added by Dragonmaster88 (talkcontribs) 06:27, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

World at War Edit?

dragonmaster i reverted your edit on the Nazi Zombies section because u seemed to delete it for no apparent reason. If your going to erase sections please provide a reason for your deleting of information on the articles discussion page either in the appropriate section or a brand new one. --Mark0528 (talk) 00:06, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

? I don't remember editing that--"I am an oktau and a baka at times but deny proven facts and you got a fight" comment added by Dragonmaster88 (talkcontribs) 03:35, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It looks like he put talk into the article [1] so you really didn't have to explain why you reverted it. --Kraftlos (Talk | Contrib) 08:37, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
oh that edit =^-^=;--"I am an oktau and a baka at times but deny proven facts and you got a fight" comment added by Dragonmaster88 (talkcontribs) 16:05, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

no that edit was fine. in fact i didnt even kno he did that. that was my fault though i didnt kno what to put there. but he deleted about 3 paragraphs from the nazi zombies section with no reason on the talk page for doign that. --Mark0528 (talk) 18:57, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

well ok then--"I am an oktau and a baka at times but deny proven facts and you got a fight" comment added by Dragonmaster88 (talkcontribs) 21:05, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure why it is becoming such an ordeal regarding The Green Hornet in this article, but the film is not scheduled for a 2009 release, which would be why it wouldn't be designated a 2009 film in the page disambiguation. Please see the studio press release projected date [2], the IMDB listing for release dates [3], the Variety article citing a summer release next year [4]. I'm not sure why you keep putting in 2009, but an article won't be made for The Green Hornet (2009 film). Wildhartlivie (talk) 08:30, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

well when searching for it as (2010 film) it doesn't come up but (2009 film) it comes up in search. I would somebody should correct this problem--"I am an oktau and a baka at times but deny proven facts and you got a fight" comment added by Dragonmaster88 (talkcontribs) 16:19, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Die Hard

Why do you keep reverting useful, constructive edits to this article? Andrea Parton (talk) 20:36, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

such as what exactly? and if you say slip from slips. that is a grammar change--"I am an oktau and a baka at times but deny proven facts and you got a fight" comment added by Dragonmaster88 (talkcontribs) 04:56, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]