Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Livia Beale
Appearance
- Livia Beale (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fictional character from a short running series with little cultural importance. Philip Stevens (talk) 11:24, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
I am also nominating the following related page for the same reason stated above:
- Delete or redirect to Journeyman (TV series). Character already adequately covered in main article. Quantpole (talk) 12:07, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
- redirect or merge to Journeyman (TV series). --60.240.117.215 (talk) 12:48, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
- Keep. Strong fan-base for the character. In addition, a great many things were revealed about the character during the series; enough for an article. -- Evans1982 (talk) 22:22, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
- Delete, page view stats do not support claim of fan base, which would really require a secondary source. Topic has no secondary sources. Abductive (reasoning) 03:56, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cirt (talk) 08:27, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:35, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:35, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
- Keep or merge I was not aware that "cultural importance" now somehow supersedes WP:N. Using such an assertion as a reason to delete would seem to encourage rather than discourage an expanded systemic bias. Far better to look at the series and the character's coverage in sources over a 4-year period and then somehow argue that such coverage does not meet guideline. "Cultural importance"? Yikes. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 20:31, 11 February 2010 (UTC)