Jump to content

User talk:Fabrictramp

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Airplaneman (talk | contribs) at 00:10, 28 March 2010 (→Talkback: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Are you playing some kind of sick joke??

Hello, Fabrictramp --

My name is Anthony Flacco and I am the author of "A CHECKLIST FOR MURDER: The True Story of Robert John Peernock." I noticed that you fouled Mr. Peernock's page with a specious comment to the effect that you were "having trouble" determining whether the book is true or false. I wonder, what part of "The TRUE Story of Robert John Peernock" did you fail to understand? Mr. Peernock is not a "whistleblower," he is a cowardly murderer who beat his wife to death with a tire-iron and then beat his seventeen-year-old-daughter in the same fashion in an attack that she barely survived and from which she will never fully recover. I began the writing of this book in the hope that he might ACTUALLY BE INNOCENT, because who doesn't love a good story about a wrongly accused person? The clear and abundant evidence against Peernock, most of which he created with his own hands, leaves no doubt for anyone who is free from the taint of special interest in the matter. So I ask you, Fabrictramp, are YOU connected to him in some way? Who else would have any interest in minimizing the horrors that this foul man perpetrated? If you have bothered to acquaint yourself with the PROVEN FACTS of this atrocious family tragedy and the abundant PHYSICAL EVIDENCE against him, you would never have publicly expressed doubt on his behalf. Garbage like him feeds upon any scrap of "doubt" that can be created. Shame on you and shame on your irresponsibility. You are a classic example of an irresponsible internet denizen who posts your poorly research crap without thinking because you feel immune from answering for your foolishness.

Where the hell are your morals?

-- Anthony Flacco —Preceding unsigned comment added by Anthony Flacco (talk • contribs) 22:05, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No, I am in no way connected with Mr. Peernock.
Could you please show me the edit to Robert Peernock where I "fouled Mr. Peernock's page with a specious comment to the effect that you were "having trouble" determining whether the book is true or false"? In reviewing the edit history of that page, I don't see anything suggesting that. The only thing I can possibly see is this edit, where you may have misinterpreted the edit summary. "need more refs to show notability" in no way implies anything about your book (which you might note that I added to the page, replacing the link to http://www.freerobertpeernock.com, which seemed a bit biased to me). It simply means that for Mr. Peernock to be notable enough to merit a Wikipedia article, we need more coverage of him than just your book; additional coverage in newspapers, magazines, other books would show that he is notable enough for a Wikipedia article.
Also, you might want to take a minute to read Wikipedia:Civility. It would really help our communication if you did.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:21, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

hitomi

you label my hitomi "by myself" article as lacking references, but I include references to the official hitomi web pages and to the independent Oricon charting archives for this album. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jessica fae (talk • contribs) 16:28, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I labeled the article as lacking independent references, in other words, it needs more than just the official site . However, I missed the Oricon ref, so I'll remove the tag. Cheers!--Fabrictramp | talk to me 16:30, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re Vegan for the Earth page deletion.

This is my response to your decision to refuse to reinstate the Vegan for the Earth page. Your first objection is that the page is an infringement of copyright. To this I would inform you that the webpage to which you refer is mine, and entirely free of copyright, as is all of my website. Your second objection is that the wikimpage represents advertising. This I am at a loss to understand as I have absolutely no commercial interest, but am rather trying to inform people, surely the purpose of wikipedia, regarding a subject, not just of interest, but of serious global concern. I would once again ask that you restore this page as soon as possible, so that I continue with my work of educating people as to the crucial link between animal farming, meat consumption, and potentially catastrophic climate change. Thank you. Matt Clowes. Veganfortheearth (talk) 17:15, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your post here demonstrates exactly the problem with restoring the page. You wrote a page with text from your web site, linking to your web site, advocating a position in decidedly non-neutral terms. Advertising does not mean that one has a commercial interest, it can also be to promote a single point of view or cause, without a neutral point of view.
Since you aren't satisfied with the original deletion or my decision not to restore the page, you can certainly take the matter to deletion review. Read the instructions carefully and make your arguments based on Wikipedia policy for best results.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 17:22, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Spotmag

What i may to do with the article of spotmag, against it deleting? Can you help to provide a correct article from mine? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Spotmag (talk • contribs) 22:53, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Have you read the links on your talk page? If so, I can answer a more specific question, but this is a bit broad.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:18, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

deletion of ARChive of Contemporary Music

We are trying to get our article on the ARChive of Contemporary Music re-posted on Wiki. It was deleted, by you, for no logical reason. You say we plagiarized the material from <http://www.si.umich.edu/pep/asb/2006/NYC/ACM.html>

re: "This page has been deleted. The deletion and move log for the page are provided below for reference. • 17:34, 4 April 2009 Anthony.bradbury (talk | contribs) deleted "ARChive of Contemporary Music" ‎ (G12: Blatant copyright infringement of http://www.si.umich.edu/pep/asb/2006/NYC/ACM.html)"


If you would use your head, and read, or do real research in the real world, you would easily see that this article, by Michigan students, who you say we plagiarized, was taken from the information we gave to them when they were interns at our archive, and is posted on our webpage. Our organization is older than the interns who posted the story about us!

So please reinstate. If people do not read carefully and place information in the correct context, then the great value of a wiki is squandered.

B. George, Director

˜˜˜˜ —Preceding unsigned comment added by B.bunchy (talk • contribs) 15:55, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I answered this the last time you asked. You can find the answer at User_talk:Fabrictramp/Archive_04#ARChive_of_Contemporary_Music, as well as instructions on how to donate material to be used in Wikipedia. --Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:22, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

बुद्धिजीवियों की एकांगी सोच

दिनांक 8 मार्च 2010 को दैनिक समाचार पत्र दैनिक जागरण मे एक खबर छपी कि माआवादियों के नेता किशनजी ने मीडिया के माध्यनम से महाश्वेकता जी से केन्द्रा और माओंवादियों के बीच मध्य स्थयता करने की अपील की है। इस वीच तथाकथित वुद्धिजीवियों ने भारत सरकार से मेदिनीपुर जिले के लालगढ मे महीनों से चल रहे सुरक्षाबलों के संयुक्तम अभियान को तत्का ल बन्दह करने की अपील की है दलील है कि इस अभियान मे निर्दोश लोग मारे जा रहे है। इन लोगो ने पुलिस संत्रास प्रतिरोध जनजागरण समिति के नेता लालमोहन अुडू की हाल मे हुई हत्यात का उदाहरण दिया है। मै इस लेख के माध्ययम से इन बुद्धिजीवियों को अवगत कराना चाहता हू कि दिनांक 29 अक्टूमबर 2009 को महाश्वेाता जी का एक लेख इसी समाचार पत्र मे छपा था जिसमे महाश्वेयता जी ने नक्सरलवाद के बजाय गैर वरावरी को देश की सवसे वडी समस्याा माना था और नक्ससल विरोधी अभियान को रोकने की अपील की थी। महाश्वेशता जी के लेख के कुछ आकडे मै प्रस्तुयत कर रहा हू। उक्त लेख मे बताया गया था कि नक्स लवाद भारत के 20 राज्योंे के 223 जिलो के 2000 थाना क्षेत्रों मै फैला हुआ है। सरकारी आकडों के अनुसार विगत वर्ष मे माओवादी हिंसा मे 721 लोग मारे गये इस वर्ष अगस्तअ तक 550 लोग मारे गये। विगत डेढ वर्ष मे 481 पुलिस कर्मी शहीद हुये। क्याि ये लोग निर्दोश नही थे क्याि ये लोग भारतवासी नही थे क्याय इनके सुरक्षा का दायित्वत भारत एवं राज्ये सरकार का नही है। आमतौर पर सरकारों पर आरोप लगता है कि वह अपराध पर प्रभावी अंकुश लगाने मे असमर्थ है सरकार मे इच्छा शक्ति नही है सरकार अपराधियों के प्रति सहानुभति रखती है आदि आदि। लेकिन जब सरकार अपराधियों के विरुद्ध अभियान छेडती है तो कभी मनावधिकार के नाम पर कभी ज्याधदती के नाम पर ये तथाकथित वुद्धिजीवी उस अभियान मे बाधा डालने आ जाते है। माओवादी आसानी से वार्ता करने को तैयार नही हुये है । जब उन्हेत लगा कि सुरक्षाबल उन्हेआ चारो तरफ से घेर लिये है और उनका बच निकलना मुश्किल है तब अपने बचाव के लिये वार्ता का ढोंग कर रहे है। अभी पिछले दिनों भारत सरकार के गृह सचिव कह रहे थें कि माओवादियों का 2050 तक पूरे भारत पर राज करने की योजना है। वे जितने भू भाग पर कब्जाै जमाये पडे है उतने भू भाग को मुक्ती कराने मे 5 से 6 वर्ष तक लग सकते है। क्याह वार्ता मे माओवादी कब्जाोयी गई सम्पूनर्ण भू भाग को छोडने के लिये तैयार है क्या वे सभी हथियार डालने के लिये तैयार है क्याे भारत सरकार की सत्ताि स्वीककार करने को तैयार है यदि उन्हेै ये सब शर्ते मन्जूार है तो वार्ता करने मे कोई हर्ज नही है लेकिन यदि वे केवल तात्का लिक राहत प्राप्तत करने के उददेश्यक से वार्ता का नाटक कर रहे है तो वार्ता करने का कोई औचित्य नही है। चिदम्बदरम जी पहली वार माओवादियों पर दवाव बनाने मे सफल हुये है इस दवाव को बनाये रखना होगा। प्राय पाया जाता है कि सुरक्षाबल अपने प्रयास से जब वे लाभकारी स्थिति मे आते है तब वार्ता का ढोग रचकर उनके प्रयास को विफल कर दिया जाता है। वैसे ही कई राज्य सरकारें और राजनीतिक पार्टियां अपने लाभ के लिये माओवादियों के विरुद्ध अभियान को भौथरा करने मे लगी हुई है उस समय कम से कम बुद्धिजीवियों से यह अपेक्षा नही की जाती है कि वे भी राष्टअहित से विलग होकर सरकार पर अनावश्येक दवाव बनायें। कृपया एकांगी सोच से बचे माओवादियों द्वारा मारे जाने वाले चाहे आम नागरिपक हो या सुरक्षा बलों के जवान वे भी भारत के नागरिक है और उनका भी मानवाधिकार है केवल अतिवादियों का मानवाधिकार नही होता है। जो अभियान चल रहा है चलने दें नही तो हमारा भी वही हस्र होगा जो नेपाल का हुआ है। —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.248.65.245 (talk) 13:14, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry, but I do not read Hindi. If you can post a question in English, I will be happy to answer it.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:23, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Feenixpawl

Hi Fabrictramp. You recently undeleted an article about Feenixpawl and a temporary biography was put up, however, it was immediately deleted due to the fact it didn't meet the criteria for a musician's bio. However it has now been amended and is completely factual and encyclopedic, and meets the criteria for a musicians article. I was wondering if it could please be moved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Joshsoon/Feenixpawl to Feenixpawl. Thank you for your time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Joshsoon (talk • contribs) 14:40, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I see that Arbitrarily0 has already done this for you. Have you read WP:COI like I suggested?--Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:25, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 22 March 2010

Re: Naveen Nursing Home

Thanks for the info. I have now prodded this article for lack of notability. De728631 (talk) 20:04, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Roy Elkins and Ruth Elkins

Hello, Fabrictramp. You have new messages at DiverDave's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Talkback

Hello, Fabrictramp. You have new messages at Airplaneman's talk page.
Message added 00:10, 28 March 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

—Airplaneman ✈— 00:10, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Fabrictramp&oldid=352432395"