Talk:1991 Pacific hurricane season

1991 Pacific hurricane season has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
December 28, 2006	Good article nominee	Not listed
March 8, 2009	Good article nominee	Listed

Current status: Good article

Template:Hurricane

Todo

To whomever is working on this article, the section for Hurricane Fefa should probably be shorter. That's why there is a separate article. Hurricanehink (talk) 00:54, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Got it. juan andrés 04:23, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have just rewritten the article from start to finish. I believe that I have resolved the concerns that were brought up in the GA review. Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 23:52, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA review

Well-written - Fail (few typos)

Compelling prose - Fail - Here's a few quick examples. "and certainly could have been associated with a tropical wave." (certainly could have?) "the next day (dates should be written out) "when upper level shear increased as a strong anticyclone centered south of Baja California" (not a complete thought) "A well organized tropical wave over northern Africa that formed for the last three days, moved off on May 31 and the convection became disorganized while traveling westward across the tropical Atlantic." (very messy sentence)
Logical structure - Weak pass - The lede is pretty short, and starts with the dull opener that should be avoided.
Follows MOS - Pass
Terms are explained -

Factually accurate - Fail - Season summary does not have sourcing
Broad - Weak Pass, though some places could use more explaining. Discussions could provide info where it otherwise is lacking, like describing how it organized and eyewall diameters
Non-POV - Pass
Stable - Pass
Images - Pass

Metric and imperial units are needed in a lot of places in the article, and the Carlos infobox needs to be fixed. The impact section is useless, given the overall lack of info. For these reasons, I failed the GA, though once these issues are addressed you should try again, given that this is a good base. Hurricanehink (talk) 20:51, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hurricane Fefa

I took this picture off and replaced it with the main one from the article.

It is obviously the same picture as the one currently on 1992 Atlantic hurricane season.Potapych (talk) 00:57, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]