Jump to content

Talk:1991 Pacific hurricane season

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by JeffGBot (talk | contribs) at 00:42, 8 June 2011 (→Robot: Reporting unavailable external link). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Good article1991 Pacific hurricane season has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 28, 2006Good article nomineeNot listed
March 8, 2009Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Good article

Template:Hurricane

Todo

To whomever is working on this article, the section for Hurricane Fefa should probably be shorter. That's why there is a separate article. Hurricanehink (talk) 00:54, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Got it. juan andrés 04:23, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have just rewritten the article from start to finish. I believe that I have resolved the concerns that were brought up in the GA review. Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 23:52, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA review

  1. Well-written - Fail (few typos)
  • Compelling prose - Fail - Here's a few quick examples. "and certainly could have been associated with a tropical wave." (certainly could have?) "the next day (dates should be written out) "when upper level shear increased as a strong anticyclone centered south of Baja California" (not a complete thought) "A well organized tropical wave over northern Africa that formed for the last three days, moved off on May 31 and the convection became disorganized while traveling westward across the tropical Atlantic." (very messy sentence)
  • Logical structure - Weak pass - The lede is pretty short, and starts with the dull opener that should be avoided.
  • Follows MOS - Pass
  • Terms are explained -
  1. Factually accurate - Fail - Season summary does not have sourcing
  2. Broad - Weak Pass, though some places could use more explaining. Discussions could provide info where it otherwise is lacking, like describing how it organized and eyewall diameters
  3. Non-POV - Pass
  4. Stable - Pass
  5. Images - Pass

Metric and imperial units are needed in a lot of places in the article, and the Carlos infobox needs to be fixed. The impact section is useless, given the overall lack of info. For these reasons, I failed the GA, though once these issues are addressed you should try again, given that this is a good base. Hurricanehink (talk) 20:51, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hurricane Fefa

I took this picture off and replaced it with the main one from the article.

It is obviously the same picture as the one currently on 1992 Atlantic hurricane season.Potapych (talk) 00:57, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 00:42, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 00:42, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:1991_Pacific_hurricane_season&oldid=433126488"