Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Urville (fictional city)

Urville (fictional city)

This is an article about a city someone dreamed up; after it was first nominated for CSD but no criteria applied, I proposed deletion. This was challenged by User:Skysmith. Original research, no notability, WP:NOT for original inventions or personal essays. Harr o5 02:13, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom (what a strange, strange, strange article). Joe 02:39, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. It's not notable or encyclopedic. It's an imaginary French city created by an autistic man in France, Gilles Trehin, whose article I put up for speedy deletion. It would set a dangerous precedent to allow anyone to put their own imaginary worlds or imaginary friends on Wikipedia. It's bad enough as things stand with all the fandom. For goodness' sake, think of the servers! Think of the poor servers! I guess I should have brought it here instead of trying to get it speedy deleted as patent nonsense. Brian G. Crawford 03:03, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- It's just that patent nonsense in this case would have been: "We is live in Urville, magical land from FraNCe..." and so on. Basically, absolute jibberish. On another note, the creator of Urville, Gilles Trehin, had an article deleted which is now on deletion review. Harr o5 03:05, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
delete this article is an extremely strange case. it certainly treats the subject in a way acceptable to wikipedia and seems encyclopedic. nonetheless, i don't think an encyclopedia could at all benefit from a fictional city that someone thought up. Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens 03:34, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Weird, weird, weird. Unencyclopedically so. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 03:44, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. autisticruft. youngamerican (talk) 04:12, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Cruft as mentioned by many others; also so weird as to give me chills. --Deville (Talk) 05:10, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - It appears that Harro5 and everybody else suspects that I am Trehin (which I am not, by the way). Therefore it appears that the case has been already decided and everything I might say would be ignored. You better remove Trehin from savant pages and elsewhere, then. - Skysmith 12:04, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all. --S iva1979^{Talk to me} 14:37, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete cruft. --Ter e nc e Ong 15:56, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as above. ProhibitOnions 20:36, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete along with its creator. Nothing notable here. Just zis Guy you know? 22:15, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above --Khoikhoi 22:33, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Put down the bong and step away from the online encyclopedia. --Chris Buckey 23:42, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]