User talk:Trdk4

I set up the Pulsing light foundation wikipedia page because they are a new business, non profit making charitable organization. This foundation has only been running for a few months, but I believe from the pree coverage that it will gradually become a much bigger organization. No doubt as the organization grows so will the information about it, so other wikipedia editors and contributors can add more and more to the page, as the info gets known. I have tried to set the page up, so others can easily add in the other relivent info about the organization as it gets more well known.Trdk4 (talk) 23:15, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Pulsing light foundation

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Pulsing light foundation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Inks.LWC (talk) 23:43, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I completely disagree with the reason for this page to be deleted, it clearly says what it does and why it is important, the organization has been getting a lot of publicity recently, and it is doing a lot of good work, you have lots of other charities and good causes, and non profit making businesses in wikipedia, a lot of people would say that this organization is hugely important to them, it clearly says that it helps dying people achieve their dreams and wishes, jst like the 'make a wish foundation' does for children, you have their info and page on wikipedia, this page is a lot more detailed than that one, so there is no reason why it should be deleted; it also explains what sort of business the foundation runs, as it has an A&R acting and modeling agency, plus a film and music production company, I feel that the editor hasn't even read the article, wikipedia should have more pages from good causes and businesses like the pulsing light foundation, this is informative and helpful; it is a growing business and it would be more than just a shame it it git deleted again, I have even set up the page so other peiple can improve it and add to it, this was so wikipedia could see that I was leaving parts of it for other editors to add and improve it. This article of mine does meet the correct criterea for wikipedia, it has had a significant amout of press coverage on its own, and these have come from reliable sources and multiple publications, meaning that my refrences have come from several reliable publications / sources.Trdk4 (talk) 13:18, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, The pusling light foundation

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, The pusling light foundation. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Pulsing light foundation. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Pulsing light foundation - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Yunshui (talk) 12:05, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attempt to circumvent the deletion discussion by recreating this article under a different name. If you wish to preserve the article, please address the concerns raised at the deletion discussion. Thank you. Yunshui (talk) 12:05, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In fact, whether or not you were attempting to circumvent the deletion discussion, please don't create duplicate articles under different titles. Doing so causes numerous problems relating to coordinating information. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:34, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You may possibly find Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not here to tell the world about your noble cause helpful. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:38, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't recreate the page to try to confuse things, when I tried to search for the page it said that it was already deleted, but I wanted to contest the decission, as I had spent ages reading all of the wikipedia guide lines, and I followed them to the letter, I did nothing wrong, I have tried all the other things in wikipedia to address my reasons why my page should not be deleted, but wikipedia is having problems and it is not doing what it says it will do, I assume that it is a maintenence problem. The reason given for deletion this time, is because it is claiming that there are no refrences, but that is untrue, the administrator couldn't finds any links online, but the wikipedia rules and guidelines states that the refrences don't have to be from an online source; also this is not my good cause, although I am aware of a family who were helped by this organization / good cause, plus I have been moved by reading about the people that they have helped; I believed that this type of story is ideal for the encyclpoedia.Trdk4 (talk) 23:10, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think there is any suggestion that your creation of multiple copies of the article was done with the intention of causing confusion. Many people when they first start contributing to Wikipedia do things in perfectly good faith, with the best of intentions, but find that what they have done comes in conflict with how Wikipedia works through no fault of their own. (I had that experience more than once when I first started to contribute, so I do know what it is like.) I explained that creating multiple copies of an article was not helpful in the hope of helping you to avoid the same mistake again, to to blame you or accuse you. As for your other points, I have responded to your comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pulsing light foundation. I hope what I have written there may help to make things clearer for you. I am sorry that you have had such a poor experience so far of contributing to Wikipedia, and I do hope that things go better for you from now on. If you want to ask for any further help or clarification please do feel very welcome to contact me on my talk page. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:35, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]