User talk:Corabal

Colin McRae

Until the coroner has confirmed that Colin McRae has died we cannot put that he has died. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sam Pears (talk • contribs) 22:18, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tense

Hi. I've reverted your change of tense because the programme still exists, even though it is no longer broadcast. The JPS^{talk to me} 14:33, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding edits to Super Mario Galaxy

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Sepmix! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule photobucket\.com, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links guidelines for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! AntiSpamBot 21:13, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Jose Mourinho's Chelsea Career

A tag has been placed on Jose Mourinho's Chelsea Career, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD g2.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Liquidfinale ^{(Ţ) (Ç) (Ŵ)} 19:28, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD Nomination: Chris Senior

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but all Wikipedia articles must meet our criteria for inclusion (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Since it does not seem that Chris Senior meets these criteria, an editor has started a discussion about whether this article should be kept or deleted.

Your opinion on whether this article meets the inclusion criteria is welcome. Please contribute to the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Senior. Don't forget to add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of each of your comments to sign them.

Discussions such as these usually last five days. In the meantime, you are free to edit the content of the article. Please do not remove the "articles for deletion" template (the box at the top). When the discussion has concluded, a neutral third party will consider all comments and decide whether or not to delete the article. Mattythewhite 15:37, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Senior

Hey. I placed the article up for deletion due to its failing of WP:BIO. This states "Competitors who have played in a fully professional league, or a competition of equivalent standing in a non-league sport such as swimming or tennis", which Senior fails, as the highest he has played is the Conference National, which is semi-professional. Thanks, Mattythewhite 21:22, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of The Peter Serafinowicz Show

A tag has been placed on The Peter Serafinowicz Show, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD a7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Pig^man 02:47, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

October 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Randy Orton. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Kip Smithers ^T/C 00:45, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not really, our readers are looking for serious articles and will not find joke edits amusing. Remember, millions of people read Wikipedia, so we have to take what we do here seriously. Kip Smithers ^T/C 00:57, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

HEy

Hey since I know you have interacted with the WWE Brand Extension article in the past, may you do me a favor and join this discussion about splitting the brand extension and drafts. click here--TrUcO9311 20:05, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Never Mind the Sources

Regarding your edit to List of Never Mind the Buzzcocks episodes – as you may see from looking over the rest of that article, NMB has never before had such an extensive run as you claim here, so we'll be needing citations for the idea that there will be more than the six previously confirmed. If you need any help with citing, just drop me a line (by hitting the second D ->) ^† D B D 03:29, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good stuff – then find the publication, issue and page and cite it in the references ^† D B D 15:12, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pity – 'fraid it can't be cited then... :( ^† D B D 16:21, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jekyll has Ended

Series one of Jekyll has ended. As of yet, there are no plans for a second series. Thus the series has ended. By your definition (whatever that may be), how would we ever mark anything as having ended? It is completely possible, whether likely or not, that there will never be another series of Jekyll. If that were the case, by your deffinition, when would you mark the series as 'ended'? With regards to your comment on the Mighty Boosh, yes that too has ended. One series (regardless of number) has ended, and another is yet to be made, thus it has ended until further notice. With respect, I think you'll find that most of the community will agree with this definition, so please, before re-reverting, state a good, solid reason why Jekyll should not be seen as ended. _TheIslander 02:32, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As a side note, in case you're unaware, please read up on WP:3RR. _TheIslander 21:26, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, whilst I'm thinking about it, it may be a good idea to go through WP:3O. That is, of course, unless you're willing to stop reverting and discuss this, either here, on my talk page, or on the article talk page (but not in edit summaries). If not, I'll file a request at WP:3O shortly. _TheIslander 21:32, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MITB

Hmm, it seems like they have changed it since I added it as a source. It used to say "Eight superstars", and now it says "A collection of superstars". TJ Spyke 00:43, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Umaga/Batista

They have done the same thing many times in the past though, hyping up a RAW vs. SmackDown match (the main event of NWO 2007 for example). TJ Spyke 22:20, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Heather Mills

Please do not gratuitously remove content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Your test is here. JungleCat Shiny!/Oohhh! 23:19, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Don't do that. You think she cares? Theresa Knott | The otter sank 23:29, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your note

Hello Sepmix. Thank you for your note. I think that you and IMDb could well be right. Unfortunately, a few years ago IMDb fell out of favor here at wikiP for various reasons. I would say that you could keep looking on the net and if you find a reliable source with this title (interestingly there was a brief UK series starring Patrick Stewert with this name a few years ago - this was followed by a US series that wasn't as good) please feel free to put it back in. Cheers and happy editing. MarnetteD | Talk 16:00, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. thanks for your followup note. No apologies necessary. Speculation around each new season of Doctor Who runs riot. Even though I am a Yank I have been following and enjoying the show since 1981 and each new season has always been eagerly anticipated by we fans. Keep enjoying both the show and editing here! MarnetteD | Talk 13:34, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Daleks and Cybermen in S5 Finale

I agree, it's common knowledge, but only due to unreliable sources and images that cannot be used as references. As the other editor said, we just don't want to set an example that other newbie editors will follow, or most articles will end up with unsourced facts typed in as invisitext lol. magnius (talk) 14:40, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did to The Pandorica Opens, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. magnius (talk) 12:43, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Color Signatures

Hey, no problem. I personally found the process kind of confusing, and don't remember how I did it that well, so rather than tell you, I'll just point you in the direction of where I was reading when I did it before. Check out WP:SIGNATURE, down by the Customization/Color/Appearance sections. Hopefully that helps. Sergecross73 msg me 17:31, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Barri Griffiths appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. ⒺⓋⒾⓁⒼⓄⒽⒶⓃ ② 18:44, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Royal Rumble 2011

Indeed, which is why I didn't take it off. I simply moved it into a footnote that is directly linked with the # heading. Hope that helps. -- Θaks ter 21:08, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. -- Θaks ter 21:27, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Corabal. You have new messages at Evilgohan2's talk page.
Message added 23:31, 20 January 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

June 2011

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to A Good Man Goes to War. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ╟─Treasury Tag►Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster─╢ 18:37, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Ched Evans, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use your sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 23:04, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2012

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Bronygarth. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Kilopi (talk) 23:07, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Alien creature

I left you a link to the talk page and the exact section necessary. Please choose to read the edit summary before commenting that no edit summary was left. The creature at the end is not confirmed in any capacity to be a Xenomorph beyond observation, in which case it fails to meet any of the established life cycle or characteristics. Until someone involved with the production confirms or denies what it is, it certainly isn't a Xenomorph. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 23:42, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, but the creature had the same head and tongue as the traditional Xenomorph, and in the end credits it stated that some characters were credited to Dan O'Bannon and Ronald Shusett, the creators of the character, no other characters other than this were linked to them.

I'm not sure how they are the creator of the character, Giger designed it. From what I remeber, those two have some ridiculous deal where they get their name on related stuff even if they had nothing to do with it. I can't remember which article I read it in so at the moment my memory is uncited. They didn't get any credit on the poster which happens even for the guy who made the first Fast and the Furious so I can't say what their credit is. Maybe the Space Jockey, or even that the design of the alien is similar enough to the Xenomorph to justify a credit if they did create it. Maybe it's because they wrote hte first one so they get credit for anything universe related including Weyland. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 01:33, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]