Wikipedia:Confirmation bias bias confirmed
| This project page is being considered for deletion in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policy.
Please discuss the matter at this page's entry on the Miscellany for deletion page. You are welcome to edit this page, but please do not blank, merge, or move it, or remove this notice, while the discussion is in progress. For more information, see the Guide to deletion. Maintenance use only: Place either {{mfd}} or {{mfdx|2nd}} on the page nominated for deletion. Then subst {{subst:mfd2|pg=Wikipedia:Confirmation bias bias confirmed|text=...}} ~~~~ to create the discussion subpage. Finally, subst {{subst:mfd3|pg=Wikipedia:Confirmation bias bias confirmed}} into the MfD log. Please consider notifying the author(s) by placing{{subst:MFDWarning|Wikipedia:Confirmation bias bias confirmed}} ~~~~on their talk page(s). |
 | This is an essay. It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints. |
 | This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously. |
 | This page in a nutshell: D U C? |
A cadre of collaborative collectivists concurred conclusively that consensually compounded considerations coincidentally create comparatively cliquish communication construction characteristics, and correspondingly cause casual confluences of commentators to confidentially confess to conspiracy concerns - a curious construct considering comprehensibility could not be more concise.