User talk:Bluegum Bill

Proposed deletion of NSW Junior Tennis Rankings

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article NSW Junior Tennis Rankings, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Even when complete, junior tennis rankings for one state of one nation are not likely to meet notability guidelines

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Mattinbgn\^talk 21:37, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of NSW Junior Tennis Rankings

I have nominated NSW Junior Tennis Rankings, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NSW Junior Tennis Rankings. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Mattinbgn\^talk 23:05, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Ebenezer vickery

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Ebenezer vickery, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://adbonline.anu.edu.au/biogs/A060355b.htm. As a copyright violation, Ebenezer vickery appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Ebenezer vickery has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Ebenezer vickery and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Ebenezer vickery with a link to where we can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Ebenezer vickery.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Porturology (talk) 05:23, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Myles and Milo Dunphy, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages South Melbourne and Victoria (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]