User talk:Kelapstick

This is Kelapstick's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11: 14 days

Archives

Archive 1	Archive 2	Archive 3
Archive 4	Archive 5	Archive 6
Archive 7	Archive 8	Archive 9
Archive 10	Archive 11

This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by when more than 1 section is present.

.

Klappy, this user is not an admin, nor was he/she on Wiki since 2000... or the rest of it on userpage. [1]--Hafspajen (talk) 14:52, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, got that, copied Bgwhite 's page. Hafspajen (talk) 14:58, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I removed a bunch of stuff that didn't apply. --kelapstick^(bainuu) 16:48, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[2], [3], who knows could be a kid, with two accounts. Hafspajen (talk) 16:51, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creates Weird pages, he redirects to his own page, [4]. But one thing I know - never decorated that page. Hafspajen (talk) 16:56, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted some categories. I have to go through some page creations as well. Picking the boy up from school now. --kelapstick^{(on the run)} 17:11, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I just did a little more cleanup, it would be good to keep an eye on contributions. --kelapstick^(bainuu) 17:53, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Worshippers of DDNEF: he's got a nice sense of humor. Hafs, maybe you should decorate his talkpage? Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 21:20, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Aw, I don't know. I am monotheist. Hafspajen (talk) 21:23, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think Shirugaki is the same account as User:Default.name = false as the latter account edited the former account's userpage. That is one confusing username. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:48, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep guessing -- Shirugaki (talk) 15:14, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

so you are openly admitting to being a sock puppet?--kelapstick^{(on the run)} 16:57, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Funny

Hi there! You removed Haf's category from User:Shirugaki; did you also take a look at his talkpage? Something funny's going on there. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 18:47, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is for sure, did you see the section directly above this? I don't have the time at the moment to give it my full attention however. --kelapstick^{(on the run)} 18:52, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A Cow For You!

	A Cow for you!
	Sorry for the stuff on your talk page... Hope this makes up for it... Somehow -- Shirugaki (talk) 00:51, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I shall call ~~him~~ her beefy. --kelapstick^{(on the run)} 21:01, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Shirugaki Thank you for the laugh. I hadn't seen that before. I shall steal it and use it. Um, Kelapstic, a "cow" is a female that has had a calf. I will call her Hafs. On second thought, thinking there is a little Hafs spawn running around is just too scary to comprehend. Bgwhite (talk) 22:02, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bgwhite ...that as the lowest of the Template:Last judgment. Hafspajen (talk) 10:33, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

..

Hello, Kelapstick. You have new messages at Hafspajen's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Oh do I now Haffy :) --kelapstick^(bainuu) 15:19, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Huh? Hafspajen (talk) 22:10, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Which message?--kelapstick^(bainuu) 22:14, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You don't MEAN you never even checked? Cry ... Hafspajen (talk) 22:15, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I did, but I couldn't see. Maybe I didn't look hard enough. --kelapstick^(bainuu) 22:17, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

SORRY - NO MESSAGES; NOTHING: 1 April!! - See, that is what I meant :) --kelapstick^(bainuu) 22:20, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Praisethe Lord. Hafspajen (talk) 22:21, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I was right the first time :)--kelapstick^(bainuu) 23:22, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion (4th nomination)

Dude, why you being such a scrooge? p b p 12:54, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I believe you have the wrong holiday. --kelapstick^(bainuu) 12:56, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You've deleted the page incorrectly. The page does not meet the criteria for G3. It is not a case of "blatant and obvious misinformation", "blatant hoax", or "redirect created by cleanup from page-move vandalism". You've should have taken it to the MfD. I suggest you familiarise yourself with Wikipedia:Deletion policy and not make such erroneous deletions again. Thank you. SD0001 (talk) 13:55, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Intentional disruption, even on April 1 is still blatant vandalism. --kelapstick^(bainuu) 13:56, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The page does not meet the criteria, and you are not allowed to use WP:COMMONSENSE on April 1. And I see that you've done the same to Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia (7th nomination)... Unacceptable. SD0001 (talk) 13:58, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Then take it up with the proper authorities. --kelapstick^(bainuu) 14:00, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are aware of Wikipedia:Rules for Fools right? I wasn't breaking any of the rules laid down there when you deleted the article. Also on the topic of it being vandalism, I hardly see how my actions compromise the integrity of Wikipedia. Bosstopher (talk) 14:14, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Call it what you want, but rules for fools (which is ridiculous in my mind), clearly says that it must be tagged as humour (for example). Massive amounts of joke MfD nominations, which are in turn speedy deletion nominated, or MfD nominated, for various reasons, clutters up and disrupts maintenance categories. Shit still has to get done here on 1 April. On top of all this, these joke MfDs etc. are not actually funny. They were barely funny in 2009, now, even less so. --kelapstick^(bainuu) 14:30, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but.... I kinda agree with SD0001 and Purplebackpack89. It was fun making those 6 (delete this "delete this ""delete this """delete this (etc.)""" "" ") pages, seeing them deleted...not so much. They had potential to be funny, and they got deleted. You know this exists...right? Zeke Essiestudy (talk) 15:41, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As I said, it was moderately funny in 2009, now we seem to be repeating the same joke over and over again for six years running. --kelapstick^(bainuu) 15:42, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I guess, but... I DID try to make things diverse. Zeke Essiestudy (talk) 15:47, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may want to tag Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia (7th nomination) with {{humor}}.--kelapstick^(bainuu) 15:49, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My Mirror AfD

I've humor-tagged the Mirror AfD, which should fix the problem... I think. Can we quit edit warring on a self-demonstrating joke? O N R (talk) 21:12, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No, you cannot make my comments mirrored. I left the discussion as mirrored, as that was the point. I readded the humour tag, if you want to switch it, fine by me. But again, don't mirror my closure comments. --kelapstick^(bainuu) 21:17, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you didn't want your closure comments mirrored, you should have un-mirrored ALL of the closure comments. But that's beside the point. O N R (talk) 21:22, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]