Talk:Vanguard: Saga of Heroes

"Summit" Links

I've removed the links to the summits on gamergod.com. These links are broken, and I couldn't find the original articles via Google.

Here is a detailed article on the "Community Summit" Community Summit Article @ Gamergod.com
Here isVanguard Beta Summit @ Gamergod.com a detailed article of the latest "Fanguard Beta Bash in Las Vegas"

--AdamBackstrom (talk) 19:46, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This article is funny.

I mean it goes on in details about the game's history and it's community but fails to mention even a single feature or anything else that would distinguish it from other MMORPGs.--195.229.242.54 20:10, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, there's a whole wiki dedicated to that here. [1] Since nothing is finalized really, and the game isn't released, I'm not sure what belongs in this article. 129.12.228.161 20:41, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think something about the actual game should be listed on this page. The key features[2] is least likely to change prior to release (with the exception of the number of classes, which is constantly bouncing around). The template at the top of the page is enough to show that the information can change, so I think someone should write a paragraph describing some of these features. --Shroom Mage 07:17, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I added as much as I know 550^talk 18:02, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

Vanguard (computer game) is an obvious duplicate page. I think it should be merged into this article. -Aknorals 13:27, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. If anyone feels up to the job that is.--DavePretty 17:29, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Done, with prejudice. Simple redirect from an obvious ad. Cwolfsheep 20:45, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vanguard: Saga of Heroes character classes

When Sigil releases information on each class Vanguard: Saga of Heroes character classes article should be started. The Races and class restrictions section should also be moved there. 550^talk 16:31, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the information for race/class combinations currently on this page should probably be removed because it's highly subject to change (not to mention uncited), and the way sub-races are grouped is very misleading. But yes, I agree that a character classes page should be made when more information is available. --Shroom Mage 22:42, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that's why I added the note on the table. The table does not have enough room to include the sub races class restrictions. However, it is straight from developer sources and if changes can be easily edited. 550^talk 16:31, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]