User talk:Sir Nasco

Welcome!

Hello, Sir Nasco, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- Longhair | Talk 10:38, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Stubs

You've just created a spate of new articles on Heng-chen, Heng-k'ai, Heng-chung, etc. which I have proposed for deletion. This means they will be deleted within five days if not brought up to community standards. Please do not create articles with so little information or content. Please instead give enough information to demonstrate the notability of the subject and back it up with verifiable sources. Savidan 06:45, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Княз_Борис(1997).jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Княз_Борис(1997).jpg. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to indicate why we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies under Wikipedia's fair use guidelines, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you want the image to be deleted, tag it as {{db-unksource}}.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have any concerns, contact the bot's owner: Carnildo.

Uriah Heep

Hi. Saw the large number of articles that you created related to Uriah Heep (band). Can you add some more information to the articles instead of the 1 liners which hardly provide more information than can be found on the Uriah Heep article iteslf? - Aksi great 13:09, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Sir Nasco! It´s just great that you created that Uriah Heep-Articles. It´s a real fun to expand them. --217.84.57.99 12:10, 30 December 2006 (UTC). my Wikipedia-page[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:KarMir.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:KarMir.jpg. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to indicate why we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies under Wikipedia's fair use guidelines, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you want the image to be deleted, tag it as {{db-unksource}}.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have any concerns, contact the bot's owner: Carnildo. 04:57, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Speedy Tags

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page and make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Dipics 16:19, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from articles as it is considered vandalism. You may place {{hangon}} on the page and make your case on the article's talk page if you oppose an article's speedy deletion. Thanks. RandyWang (^raves/_rants) 09:03, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pink Floyd Song articles

Hi Sir Nasco. I see you've created a few articles of Pink Floyd songs. Great! Contributions to the encyclopedia are always welcome. Unfortunately, none of the articles include any data other than the title, and thus have been tagged for speedy deletion in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion guidelines. What I suggest is that you either a) create the pages with relevant content, similar to other song articles, or b) wait to create the pages until you have such information. Thanks. CPAScott 13:47, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Katun Anastazya of Bulgaria

A user has added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Katun Anastazya of Bulgaria, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but they don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and they've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. James086Talk 08:39, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Little context in Prince Tassilo of Bulgaria

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Prince Tassilo of Bulgaria, by Calton (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Prince Tassilo of Bulgaria is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Prince Tassilo of Bulgaria, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 06:35, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Legacy (song)

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article The Legacy (song), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 23:54, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of The Legacy (song)

The Legacy (song), an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that The Legacy (song) satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Legacy (song) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of The Legacy (song) during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 07:29, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "Aetherius (band)"

A page you created, Aetherius (band), has been tagged for deletion in accordance with our deletion policy. In particular, it meets one or more criteria for speedy deletion; the relevant criterion is:

No context. Very short articles with little or no context for their statements.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

If you have any questions, please contact an administrator for assistance. Thank you —αἰτίας •discussion• 22:03, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Close to the Edge and Back

I have nominated Close to the Edge and Back, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Close to the Edge and Back. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Craig Montgomery (talk) 21:56, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Gracinha Leporace

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Gracinha Leporace, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Gracinha Leporace seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Gracinha Leporace, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 21:40, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Aetherius (band)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Aetherius (band), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:15, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Beardfish (band)

I have nominated Beardfish (band), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beardfish (band). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Master&Expert (Talk) 11:21, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD template

Hello, Sir Nasco. While your work is appreciated, please do not remove AfD tags from articles until discussion is over, as you have done on Beardfish (band). Feel free to comment on its AfD page. Master&Expert (Talk) 12:02, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Bantam to Behemoth.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Bantam to Behemoth.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:06, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Birds and Buildings

A tag has been placed on Birds and Buildings requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Hoponpop69 (talk) 13:55, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bantam to Behemoth.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bantam to Behemoth.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:13, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Sir Nasco! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 10 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 1 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Prince Boris of Bulgaria - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Kubrat, Prince of Panagyurishte - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Bernie Shaw - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Phil Lanzon - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Paul Newton (musician) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Colin Wood - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Ian Clarke (drummer) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
John Sloman - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Gregg Dechert - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Russell Gilbrook - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:28, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shambat (khan) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shambat (khan) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shambat (khan) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – S. Rich (talk) 22:11, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]