Jump to content

Talk:IEEE 802.11b-1999

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 206.248.179.86 (talk) at 13:17, 27 February 2016. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

I have removed the part where is falsely stated that IEEE was marketed as WIFI around the world. IEEE and wifi consortium are not the same thing.

Spectrum manager — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.196.173.65 (talk) 04:22, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The main WIFI article state that: 'Not every IEEE 802.11-compliant device is submitted for certification to the Wi-Fi Alliance, sometimes because of costs associated with the certification process' SO indeed the statement about 802.11 being marketed as WIFI is a common myth.

WikiProject iconComputing: Networking Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by Networking task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

The main article "IEEE 802.11b-1999" mentions ranges of several kilometers, with high gain antennas. This seems very strange, as the regular MAC protocol probably does not support it. A reference to someone who actually managed to do this is essential here. Anyone who did this probably used a very elusive mode, and also high transmit power and high gain antenna. The high transmit power would be in violation of FCC rules. Any local 802.11b devices may suffer from extreme interferece. Some devices might even be damaged. This high power transmission may even interfere outside of the WIFI band. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.91.60.10 (talk) 10:21, 11 February 2008 (UTC) I do not under stand eny of this —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.191.216.3 (talk) 16:05, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Direct extension of DSSS"

What does it mean that it is a direct extension of DSSS? Why not say that it uses DSSS modulation?

188.58.21.168 (talk) 22:21, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]