User talk:Thelaststory99

Thelaststory99, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Thelaststory99! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Osarius (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

talk pages

Please don't remove threads from someone else's talk page. Yes, I know you started the thread, but the user had answered it so it's not appropriate for you top blank it. Meters (talk) 06:27, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok , didn't know that , thanks :)--Thelaststory99 (talk) 06:50, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. David.moreno72 03:02, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tafila Technical University

I have removed the content you added to the above article. The Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) is not a compatible license with this wiki. Please let me know if you have any questions. Sorry, — Diannaa (talk) 19:53, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is my fault, I was not aware version 4.0 is not backwards-compatible with version 3.0. You need to license it under version 3.0 instead, you can use this banner for that:

<a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"><img alt="Creative Commons License" style="border-width:0" src="https://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-sa/3.0/88x31.png" /></a><br />This work is licensed under a <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/">Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License</a>.

– nyuszika7h (talk) 20:16, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

nyuszika7h , don't worry , its ok , but i don't know what is the next requirement that will come as surprise :), thanks--Thelaststory99 (talk) 16:02, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Tafila Technical University. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 10:15, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Thelaststory99 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Now only me will edit from this IP , why still blocked?

Decline reason:

This does not address the reason for your block. You are believed to be the same person behind Ahmadsw (talk · contribs) (and so, we'll only consider an unblock request on that account) and have added promotional material and violated copyright in your edits. Yamla (talk) 12:47, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Yamla (talk · contribs) , oh my God!! , I told you.. that username belongs to my friend ahmad!! I told him to stop editing, and the copyright issue has been fixed by adding the CC thing to our website , and according to the promotional thing , they didn't even give me the chance to change it , they just blocked me . do many administrators compete on blocking and deleting articles? it is so silly from admins to be so mean to us like this .

--Thelaststory99 (talk) 05:30, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You did not tell us that. And in any case, you've just admitted you are indeed a sockpuppet. See WP:MEAT. --Yamla (talk) 11:23, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yamla (talk · contribs) I told many admins about all of that , if admins have problems of low coordination, then its not our problem , and I didn't admit any thing , you just give me useless links which some admins need to read also not only me , this site just making me sick --Thelaststory99 (talk) 09:49, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]