Talk:Project portfolio management

	; Archives (Index) ;
	2013; 2014; 2016;
	This page is archived by ClueBot III.

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Business Mid‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Systems: Project management Mid‑importance

	Systems science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Systems, which collaborates on articles related to systems and systems science.SystemsWikipedia:WikiProject SystemsTemplate:WikiProject SystemsSystems
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the field of Project management.

Written as an Advertisement?

In May of 2013 a notice was put up that this article appears to be written like an advertisement. I actually disagree with that. I read through a lot and gained some good insight for a project I'm working on. Should that notice be removed or do others disagree with me? Jasenlee (talk) 15:46, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'll agree and take it down. The notice was posted 20:13, 13 May 2013‎ by user 66.6.146.58

There is no talk or detail to work with, the description at history only says "(holy crap)"
No such concern apparent to Jasenlee and I and nobody else voiced one
Significant time and deletions have occurred - e.g. sections The PPM market and Capability Definition, and references to PMI PMBOK and Gartner. (I think it was better before but ... point here is that eliminated area where such a concern might have been.)

Deleting next Markbassett (talk) 15:12, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lacking in references to reliable sources

OK, so it's not advertising... but it isn't a good page yet. The page is lacking in references to actual sources. Many pages on Wikipedia that look like this have been deleted for being non notable. Let's not let a valid page die because we are too lazy to cite sources. Nickmalik (talk) 21:28, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]