Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nsmutte

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 172.58.41.56 (talk) at 03:40, 20 February 2017 (Comments by other users: add). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Nsmutte

Nsmutte (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

Older archives were moved to an archive of the archive because of the page size and are listed below:

For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nsmutte/Archive.

A long-term abuse case exists at Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Nsmutte.



15 February 2017

– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.

Suspected sockpuppets


S nominated Bonadea's user page for deletion and B shows up to vote. Standard trolling by this O/C person. These accounts often come in waves so a C/U is requested to sniff out any others MarnetteD|Talk 02:44, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments



15 February 2017

– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.

Suspected sockpuppets

Tag-team deletion dickery at Adair Park Historic District and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adair Park Historic District. Same bad spelling and idiosyncatic template use, but as creating their own article to nominate is a new tactic, I'm getting a second opinion. BethNaught (talk) 14:55, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have nothing of value to add to this but I am still laughing at this: Tag-team deletion dickery. This might be the best description of Nsmutte's vandalism yet. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 16:26, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Adding Skytop333 due to their abuse filter hit which is in the usual Nsmutte layout. BethNaught (talk) 00:06, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Added Kaajupakoda (talk · contribs). 172.56.38.78 (talk) 03:59, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Added Jumritha (talk · contribs). 172.56.38.78 (talk) 04:34, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Added Sdfghjrdfgt (talk · contribs). 172.56.38.78 (talk) 04:50, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
+Bagunnayi. BethNaught (talk) 08:07, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
+Nuvvuedianna because of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frank Norris (footballer)]. BethNaught (talk) 13:57, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims. Any bets that Bowser0000 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki) is not another one? Created a copy of an existing article and immediately took it to AfD. --bonadea contributions talk 17:01, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments



17 February 2017

– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.

Suspected sockpuppets


Still more anti-Bonadea deletion dickitude (and WP:DUCKitude) at Sigurveig Jónsdóttir. --Finngall talk 03:56, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Yup, was just about to add Elaayinaparledu (talk · contribs) myself... 172.58.41.33 (talk) 04:28, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I reported the two accounts to WP:AIV and Oshwah nuked them... 172.58.41.33 (talk) 05:08, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments



19 February 2017

– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.

Suspected sockpuppets

Fits pattern of AfD disruption, but no quacking as of yet. BethNaught (talk) 12:45, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

@Favonian and BethNaught: I found and added another little duckling... (User:StadiumCCC). 172.58.41.56 (talk) 03:22, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Materialscientist has now blocked them. 172.58.41.56 (talk) 03:40, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments