User talk:James spencer moulson
Welcome
|
August 2016
Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Parental alienation, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. FuriouslySerene (talk) 14:44, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
Pizzagate
Please stop your disruptive editing at Pizzagate and please stop inserting links to your draft article at other articles. We do not link to draft articles. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 23:47, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
November 2016
This is your only warning; if you add defamatory content to Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Acroterion (talk) 00:46, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
- Additionally, if you create links from article space to draft space again, you will be blocked for disruption. Acroterion (talk) 00:48, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Acroterion (talk) 03:05, 28 November 2016 (UTC)- It is not acceptable to promote a defamatory rumor by omission or by granting it credibility that is debunked in reliable sources. Acroterion (talk) 03:10, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
Pizzagate
|
Pizzagate |
| Just wanted to thank you for your positive contributions! Leerwesen (talk) 04:00, 30 November 2016 (UTC) |
Discretionary sanctions notification
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Template:Z33 Ian.thomson (talk) 10:01, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
MfD nomination of Draft:Pizzagate (conspiracy theory)
Draft:Pizzagate (conspiracy theory), a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Pizzagate (conspiracy theory) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Pizzagate (conspiracy theory) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Sagecandor (talk) 17:04, 30 November 2016 (UTC)