Jump to content

Robotic governance

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by JamesHalliday (talk | contribs) at 17:36, 19 March 2017 (Created page with ''''Robotic Governance''' provides a regulatory framework to deal with autonomous and intelligent machines[1][2][3]. This includes research and development activi...'). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Robotic Governance provides a regulatory framework to deal with autonomous and intelligent machines[1][2][3]. This includes research and development activities as well as handling of these machines. The idea is related to the concepts of Corporate Governance, Technology Governance[1] and IT-Governance, which provide a framework for the management of organizations or the focus of a global IT infrastructure. Robotic Governance describes the impact of robotics, automation technology and artificial intelligence on society from a holistic, global perspective, considers implications and provides recommendations for actions in a Robot Manifesto. This is realized by the Robotic Governance Foundation, an international non-profit organization[4]. The Robotic Governance approach is based on the German research on discourse ethics. Therefore, the discussion should involve all Stakeholders, including scientists, society, religion, politics, industry as well as labor unions in order to reach a consensus on how to shape the future of robotics and artificial intelligence. The compiled framework, the so-called Robot Manifesto, will provide voluntary guidelines for a self-regulation in the fields of research, development as well as use and sale of autonomous and intelligent systems. The concept does not only appeal on the responsibility of researchers and robot manufacturers, but like with child labor and sustainability, also means a raising of opportunity costs. The greater public awareness and pressure will become concerning this topic, the harder it will get for companies to conceal or justify violations. Therefore, from a certain point it will be cheaper for organizations to invest in sustainable technologies and accepted.