User talk:TanmayRaoM

Welcome!

Hello, TanmayRaoM, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Ekabhishek^talk 07:41, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Namit Das

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Namit Das. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:11, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi LaraBot . Yes i will add the reference soon. There is not much available on the internet about the person. So searching references. TanmayRaoM (talk) 04:24, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

Please make sure your edits on Bigg Boss 7 are in accordance with the Wikipedia:WikiProject Big Brother otherwise they might be reverted and reported. Thanks. --ZakootaBarood (talk) 21:25, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Which edit are you talking about. Some people are changing the nationalities of the contestants . I changed it back to what it was TanmayRaoM (talk) 04:28, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

1. You changed the color of the "Not in house" row in the table to pink. It's not as it is.

2. You keep adding dark colors to the heaven/hell table making it look extremely inappropriate.

3. Incorrect usage of grammar. Please make sure your edits are in accordance with correct English language.

Regardless you're doing a good job on the page. I would like you to complete the TRP section to the page since new TRPs have been announced. I will post it on your talkpage soon. Thanks. --ZakootaBarood (talk) 06:44, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry for the grammatical mistakes. But I believe points 1 and 2 I have not done. I have never changed any color so far. I think you are talking about some one else's edits.

I was searching for the TRPs but i could not get it . What about the Devil/angel of the week . Should that be added? TanmayRaoM (talk) 08:33, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have fetched the TRPs through TAM research India from various site and the table is as such:

==Rating, Reception and Viewership==

===Indian Television ratings===
Official ratings are taken from [[TAM Media Research]] India.<ref>http://www.bestmediainfo.com/2013/09/gec-watch-mahabharat-gets-epic-start-bigg-boss-pushes-colors-up/</ref>

{| class="wikitable" style="font-size:90%; text-align:center; width: 27%; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"
|-
! scope="col" rowspan="2" style="width:43%;"|
! scope=col colspan=5| {{nowrap|[[Target rating point]]s (TRPs)}}
|-
! {{nowrap|Week 1}}
!{{nowrap|Week 2}}
!{{nowrap|Week 3}}
!{{nowrap|Week 4}}
!{{nowrap|Week 5}}

|-
! width=200|Monday
| 3.85
|3.30
|3.36
|3.30
|3.45
|-
! Tuesday
| 2.31
|2.11
|2.01
|1.98
|1.32
|-
! Wednesday
| 2.56
|2.34
|2.09
|2.11
|2.05
|-
! Thursday
| 2.76
|2.70
|2.98
|2.23
|2.16
|-
!  Friday
|   2.26
|2.10
|2.21
|2.12
|1.56
|-
! Saturday
| 2.61
|2.97
|3.01
|3.34
|3.78
|-
! Sunday
|1.15
|1.28
|1.14
|1.23
|1.15
|- style="background:#FADADD;" |
! Weekly average
| 2.50
|2.40
|2.40
|2.33
|2.21
|- style="background:#EEDC82;" |
! Running average
| 2.50
|2.45
|2.43
|2.38
|2.23
|- style="background:#ADDFAD;" |
! Series average
| colspan="5" | 2.37
|}

Add it to the page replacing the outdated one. :) --ZakootaBarood (talk) 10:37, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

TanmayRaoM, ZakootaBarood is a sockpuppet of User:Imtitanium, who is indefinitely blocked for copyright violations and other disruptive behaviour. Another sockpuppet of his, User:BakwasNaKarBay, also asked you to make edits for him earlier this month [1]. Please do not make edits on behalf of any of these throwaway accounts he creates. If you're contacted again by a new user you believe to be User:Imtitanium, please bring this to the attention of an administrator. —Psychonaut (talk) 08:59, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bigg Boss 7

Two users are destroying the Bigg boss 7 page . they are changing the tables. How can it be restrcited. USers are Safee Khawaja and Priya 1188r. TanmayRaoM (talk) 15:47, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I saw some users were changing the tables, but it wasn't clear to me that they were doing anything wrong. What exactly is the problem? For example, are they inserting incorrect information, or breaking the table layout? In any case I suggest you try contacting the users on their talk pages and/or on the article's talk page to discuss your concerns. Problems can often be resolved very quickly that way. —Psychonaut (talk) 19:14, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I was not aware of sock puppeting . How can I make sure that the user is genuine and does that mean that the barnstar he gave me was fake. Regarding the table . Some user predicted the whole results of the show, in the sense he predicted the winner and then also changed the colors of the table. I have told them so on their talk pages but they have not responded. TanmayRaoM (talk) 11:15, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

How do I know that which user is a administrator . Please help me on that too TanmayRaoM (talk) 11:22, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Imtitanium: The barnstar is real; it's just that the fake account of a known vandal gave it to you. For this reason it's not something I personally would keep on my own user talk page, but of course what you do with it is up to you. There's no easy way for regular users like me and you to tell sockpuppet accounts from genuine ones. However, there are certain behaviours which might arouse your suspicion, such as a new account making similarly worded edits and talk page messages to a blocked account. In such cases you can always approach a more experienced user or administrator for help. Administrators who have recently participated in maintenance of the Bigg Boss 7 page include User:Wizardman and User:Mark Arsten.

Regarding the users who were disrupting the Bigg Boss 7 page, I see what you mean. For cases of obvious vandalism, you can simply revert their edits, but you should always leave a polite message for them on their talk page explaining why, because it's possible they disrupted the page accidentally. If they repeat the disruptive edits several times, you can report them to Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism and an administrator will deal with it. —Psychonaut (talk) 11:32, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, TanmayRaoM. You have new messages at Benison P Baby's talk page.
Message added 12:32, 29 October 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Benison talk with me 12:32, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, TanmayRaoM. You have new messages at Planet Herald's talk page.
Message added 13:22, 12 November 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Herald talk with me 13:22, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, TanmayRaoM. You have new messages at Planet Herald's talk page.
Message added 16:18, 12 November 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Herald talk with me 16:18, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree files

Some of your uploads may be unfree. See Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2013 November 15#OTRS pending since July. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:37, 15 November 2013 (UTC) Hi . It is an image directly obtained from the person himself[reply]

Bigg Boss 7 Confusion

Please see this link."This is the link". Retrieved 23 December 2013. It will conclude that Armaan was eliminated on Day 97.Thanks.--Param Mudgal (talk) 09:44, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, TanmayRaoM. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]