Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Hinchcliffe (political strategist)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Firefox09101 (talk | contribs) at 10:35, 15 September 2017 (Tom Hinchcliffe (political strategist)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Tom Hinchcliffe (political strategist) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks notability - an MP is notable, their office staff aren't. Cabayi (talk) 13:30, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 13:30, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 13:32, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Because it doesn't meet the criteria - in this case there's a case to merge with Hamilton's article or it's possible my google-fu is not very good. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:47, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:05, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MergeI propose merging this with Fabian Hamilton as it seems extremely relevant to his page.Pigeon0999 (talk) 10:29, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Anything Hamilton does publicly is directed through him so should be merged

Merge Think a merge with Hamilton would be best as he, apparently, controls the whole media strategy and public affairs of Hamilton's office and Shadow Cabinet position