User talk:Lisa01011
Welcome!
|
Nomination of Ko Ko Bop Challenge for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ko Ko Bop Challenge is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ko Ko Bop Challenge until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ‡ Єl Cid, Єl Caɱ̩peador ᐐT₳LKᐬ 13:20, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
Ernestchuajiasheng (talk) 05:04, 27 September 2017 (UTC)== Lay I NEED U ==
WOW, good job on creating Lay's I NEED YOU page, your work is impressive and quick. fighting
October 2017
 | This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. TonyBallioni (talk) 16:42, 29 October 2017 (UTC) |
Lisa01011 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=The account of me (lisa01011) and my sister (ELSAK_07) were both blocked. We decided to appeal the block from the older and more active accounts, as the guidelines proposes to post the appeal from the 'original' account. We have read the sock puppetry article as well as the appeling guideline amd learned about the ban of multiple accounts using the same IP address. We aren't trying to deceive anybody or vandalize anybodys work. The articles we have posted so far have always been based on facts and verified with references that we have also checked multiple times. Some articles were added while not logged in, but that was not intentional. If the usage of both accounts while using the same IP address seems to cause troubles, we are willing to delete one account or refrain from using both - either way we will do our best to follow Wikipedia's guidelines. |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=The account of me (lisa01011) and my sister (ELSAK_07) were both blocked. We decided to appeal the block from the older and more active accounts, as the guidelines proposes to post the appeal from the 'original' account. We have read the sock puppetry article as well as the appeling guideline amd learned about the ban of multiple accounts using the same IP address. We aren't trying to deceive anybody or vandalize anybodys work. The articles we have posted so far have always been based on facts and verified with references that we have also checked multiple times. Some articles were added while not logged in, but that was not intentional. If the usage of both accounts while using the same IP address seems to cause troubles, we are willing to delete one account or refrain from using both - either way we will do our best to follow Wikipedia's guidelines. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=The account of me (lisa01011) and my sister (ELSAK_07) were both blocked. We decided to appeal the block from the older and more active accounts, as the guidelines proposes to post the appeal from the 'original' account. We have read the sock puppetry article as well as the appeling guideline amd learned about the ban of multiple accounts using the same IP address. We aren't trying to deceive anybody or vandalize anybodys work. The articles we have posted so far have always been based on facts and verified with references that we have also checked multiple times. Some articles were added while not logged in, but that was not intentional. If the usage of both accounts while using the same IP address seems to cause troubles, we are willing to delete one account or refrain from using both - either way we will do our best to follow Wikipedia's guidelines. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}